 2010 LPE Firebird |
|
|||||||||
  |
 Dec 18 2009, 04:45 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Grumpy  Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,722 Joined: 1-January 04 From: Bakersfield CA Member No.: 81  |
Have you guys seen this? I like it except for the rim's.
http://www.planetlsx.com/vehicles/Lingenfe..._Am_Concept/118 |
 |
 
|
|
Dec 18 2009, 08:05 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Experienced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,766 Joined: 10-April 04 From: New Orleans, LA Member No.: 303 |
(IMG:http://www.planetlsx.com/images/articles/118-5.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.dodge.com/shared/2009/charger/gallery/images/ext/04_ext_phtgal_char_09.jpg) Not a fan of the LPE Dodgiac Chargerbird. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2009, 09:23 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Angry White Man Group: Advanced Members Posts: 268 Joined: 11-October 06 From: Port Colborne ON CAN Member No.: 1,404 |
That's just plain ol' fugly IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2009, 10:21 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Mullet club chairman Group: Advanced Members Posts: 786 Joined: 25-March 06 From: South Bend IN Member No.: 1,135 |
I think it's stupid. They are taking a car that is styled like a 1st gen and hanging all the 2nd gen stuff on it and thats just wrong. I'd like the car better if it was dressed up like a '69 Trans am with the fixed twin scoops and pedastal rear wing. The arctic white and lucerne blue paint can stay. The shaker hood, duck tail spoiler, and honey comb wheels belong on a 70 or 71 which is a completely different body style.
Here is the difference.... (IMG:http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w178/1meanz/1969ta26.jpg) (IMG:http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w178/1meanz/IMG_0914.jpg) |
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2009, 11:38 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Grumpy Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,722 Joined: 1-January 04 From: Bakersfield CA Member No.: 81 |
Wow 3 strikes! So much for fbody love, its a cold world!
This post has been edited by firehawkclone: Dec 18 2009, 11:39 PM |
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2009, 11:59 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 38 Joined: 28-December 05 Member No.: 1,026 |
you can tell a body shop put the front end of a 2nd gen firebird on a much bigger bodied '10 camaro. did ligenfelter pick up the parts from pep boys?
how about reshaping/molding a front end to resemble the 2nd gen front end without actually putting a 2nd gen front end on. tell lingenfelter to stay in the engine bay and then ship the car to chip foose This post has been edited by DrivinSidewayz: Dec 19 2009, 12:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 03:10 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Experienced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,086 Joined: 16-January 04 From: Chandler AZ Member No.: 130 |
I have seen other renderings of a second-gen T/A on the current chassis, and that looks much better than the actual 2010 Camaro. I could get over the "Porky the Pig" weight problem if the body and interior looked better.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 05:30 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
CMCer Group: Moderators Posts: 2,932 Joined: 12-February 04 From: the sticks near VIR Member No.: 194 |
I'm not too fond of the front end of it but the rest of it is great!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 03:48 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 239 Joined: 18-July 04 From: Columbus, Ohio Member No.: 410 |
All else being equal, I'd take the 'bird. I had 2 second gen T/A's, so I'm a bit partial.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 04:55 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Veteran Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,640 Joined: 25-December 03 From: Louisville, KY Member No.: 40 |
Wouldn't it be cool if someone came out with a modern muscle car bodykit? As opposed to the current Camaro that is fugly as sin imho. Why do V8, rwd cars from the big three have to look retro? This fad is really getting old.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 05:13 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 5,226 Joined: 24-December 03 From: Danville, CA, USA Member No.: 27 |
...dunno....looks like a Firebird to me.....but then I never liked the looks of them to begin with.... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2009, 01:22 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 239 Joined: 8-May 09 From: Columbus, OH Member No.: 4,935 |
Personally, I like this attempt much better. -> http://www.2002firehawk-c26.net/HeritageFBody.html
Interior is a bit much for me, but I liked the overall package. The Penske Camaro was pretty cool too. (IMG:http://www.2002firehawk-c26.net/HeritageFBody/2003HeritageTA07.jpg) (IMG:http://www.2002firehawk-c26.net/HeritageFBody/2003HeritageTA08.jpg) (IMG:http://www.2002firehawk-c26.net/HeritageFBody/2003HeritageTA04.jpg) (IMG:http://www.2002firehawk-c26.net/HeritageFBody/2003HeritageTA17.JPG) This post has been edited by cozog: Dec 20 2009, 01:25 AM |
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2009, 06:12 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 38 Joined: 28-December 05 Member No.: 1,026 |
that 4th gen is the sickest ive seen, i remember seeing that in a magazine a few years ago and spent many nights with lotion and a sock.... hehe. i was contemplating modifying a ducktail camaro spoiler to replace my TA's wing
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 09:18 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 440 Joined: 25-December 03 From: Newport Beach, California Member No.: 41 |
All Right! Firebird nazis needed a new deity!
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2010, 08:56 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 208 Joined: 28-September 08 Member No.: 2,311 |
I saw the LPE car at SEMA. It looks even more big and bulky than the Camaro.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2010, 11:53 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Mullet club chairman Group: Advanced Members Posts: 786 Joined: 25-March 06 From: South Bend IN Member No.: 1,135 |
I'm dissapointed in the 5th gen, and to a much greater degree Government Motors in general. I'll be shopping for Fords if I ever buy a new vehicle...
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2010, 11:58 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 208 Joined: 28-September 08 Member No.: 2,311 |
QUOTE (1meanZ @ Jan 2 2010, 06:53 PM)  I'm dissapointed in the 5th gen, and to a much greater degree Government Motors in general. I'll be shopping for Fords if I ever buy a new vehicle... I agree. The GM anti Challenger hype was all about how big and heavy it was and then they turn around and come out with a car that is the same way but doesn't ride as nice. The handling feels uninspired and vague like they decided to err on the side of boredom (think stock '05 Mustang GT) and they made an interior that looks like it was stolen from a b-movie spaceship. The only thing the new Camaro really has going for it after riding and driving in one I would say is the seats, they are probably the best combination of support and comfort of any seats GM has ever put in anything from the factory, Corvette included. I am planning to buy a new car next year(2011) and right now I have to admit a 5.0 Mustang is at the top of the short list. -Tim |
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2010, 04:23 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 205 Joined: 30-June 05 Member No.: 795 |
The 2010 Mustang looks sleeker and sexier than the plump Camaro.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2010, 04:42 AM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Experienced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,086 Joined: 16-January 04 From: Chandler AZ Member No.: 130 |
QUOTE (wannafbody @ Jan 25 2010, 09:23 PM) The 2010 Mustang looks sleeker and sexier than the plump Camaro. It's not a light-weight either. Here's a better rendition of the updated TA - http://www.transamdepot.com/phoenix-trans-am.cfm |
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2010, 05:34 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
newbie Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 12-September 09 Member No.: 6,211 |
If only they would finish the look with the interior by stretching the guages across like a TA should be. I never liked the guages on the gen 1 Camaro and still don't like them on the gen 5.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th June 2025 - 02:23 PM |