![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 56 Joined: 5-January 05 From: Gig Harbor, WA Member No.: 592 ![]() |
There is a thread on IRS vs Live axle on Camaroz28.com asking why the IRS Ccobras suck.
I thought they did well in AI but don't really remember. Does anyone have info on the IRS Cobras vs solid axle? http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread....583#post4517583 Evan |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 3,323 Joined: 30-March 06 From: Detroit Suburbs Member No.: 1,144 ![]() |
I have some 3rd hand data to add to this.
At my previous employer I worked with a guy that wrote a book on chassis engineering and I asked him this exact question. He didn't do the testing first hand, but someone that he knew in the Trans Am series did what seemed to be a pretty fare test and found that the beam axle was consistantly 1-2 seconds faster on a road course. I think he said that the beam axle car was 100 lbs heavier (is a beam axle package heavier? If not it was the other way around), and I can't remember if they added weight to the IRS car to make it equal or not. Of course I said "why?" He thought it was because of reduced wheel deflections (camber and toe) and the increased antisquat that you can get with a beam axle suspension allowed the car to put the power down sooner coming out of the corners. I didn't know this, but evidently you can't get as much antisquat with an independent. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th May 2025 - 09:20 AM |