![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 56 Joined: 5-January 05 From: Gig Harbor, WA Member No.: 592 ![]() |
There is a thread on IRS vs Live axle on Camaroz28.com asking why the IRS Ccobras suck.
I thought they did well in AI but don't really remember. Does anyone have info on the IRS Cobras vs solid axle? http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread....583#post4517583 Evan |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,511 Joined: 14-November 04 From: Homer Glen, IL Member No.: 540 ![]() |
There was a thread on CC a while back that someone was dropping hints that with some tweaking and testing the IRS was as fast as a solid axle in an AI car on a smooth track while the IRS was faster on a bumpy course.
You'll have to go digging for more info because I don't remember, but my guess would be that the Cobra IRS is too sloppy (rubber bushings/geometry) out of the box because it was designed for a street car to have good street manners. Oh, and the IRS is heavier overall then the solid axle but it has lower unsprung weight, FWIW. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 3,323 Joined: 30-March 06 From: Detroit Suburbs Member No.: 1,144 ![]() |
Oh, and the IRS is heavier overall then the solid axle but it has lower unsprung weight, FWIW. Ok, thanks, it was the other way then. I think they added weight to the beam axle car for the test. I also forgot to mention that this test is probably 20 years old (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th May 2025 - 12:01 PM |