![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 205 Joined: 30-June 05 Member No.: 795 ![]() |
saw a segment on the news about the 2012 requirent for vehicles to have anti-rollover potection. The technology uses braking and steering control to reduce the chance of rollover. do you think this will kill autocrossing?
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,289 Joined: 4-May 04 From: Kenvil, NJ Member No.: 331 ![]() |
I'm on the fence about this one.
On one hand you know there are people who need it most of the time and others who would only use it once in a while. Saying even the best driver never needs it is completely wrong. As for the sporting side of things, I see how it can be used as a training device (assuming it has a big light that lets you know when it is working). I can also see how it is an unfair advantage. This can also keep people from being scared of driving their rear wheel drive cars in the winter! Would we need a stabilitrack class for autocross, a completely different PAX system, can we tell everyone to shut it off (and actually enforce it)? Damned if I know the answer. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 368 Joined: 22-September 05 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 892 ![]() |
Would we need a stabilitrack class for autocross, a completely different PAX system, can we tell everyone to shut it off (and actually enforce it)? We've got TCS and Stabilitrack in our Trailblazer SS. There's not a chance that it would be faster with the systems "on" in the hands of an experienced driver. As long as there's a way to turn them off I don't think they'll be a factor at the higher level of the sport. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th June 2025 - 05:46 AM |