IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Hotpart.comBlaine Fabrication.comSolo PerformanceUnbalanced EngineeringUMI Performance
> The end of autocross?, anti-rollover mandate...
wannafbody
post Apr 6 2007, 09:16 PM
Post #1


Member
*

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 205
Joined: 30-June 05
Member No.: 795



saw a segment on the news about the 2012 requirent for vehicles to have anti-rollover potection. The technology uses braking and steering control to reduce the chance of rollover. do you think this will kill autocrossing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
pknowles
post Apr 9 2007, 02:37 PM
Post #2


Experienced Member
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,427
Joined: 12-February 04
From: Huntingtown, MD
Member No.: 193



I can see this happening on trucks, vans, and SUV's, but you have to hit a ramp or something to flip most cars and rollover protection can't anticipate that. This legislation at least makes more sense than mandatory tire pressure monitors. My biggest question is what is the vehicle going to do to stop the roll over? I'm not sure I would want a vehicle to correctively steer for me in any situation. I can imagine steering to avoid an accident and the computer senses to many instant G's and steers me back into the accident. Applying the brakes on the loaded wheels would be OK and might prevent a roll over.

My mom had a Ford Bronco II which is the vehicle that is rated one of the (if not the) worst in roll over . I drove it a few times and yes I could get it to lift a wheel easily (which for crap street tires is scary), but you still had to try to roll it, have bad shocks (probably why most rolled over), or hit something to roll it. I truly believe that if I braked, snapped the steering wheel hard one way while going over 50mph that I could have rolled it, but my moms did have bad shocks. But I don't think I could roll a Camaro unless I hit something, which again no computer can account for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
wannafbody   The end of autocross?   Apr 6 2007, 09:16 PM
nape   QUOTE (wannafbody @ Apr 6 2007, 04:16 PM)...   Apr 6 2007, 09:33 PM
slowTA   I'm on the fence about this one. On one hand ...   Apr 7 2007, 01:08 AM
DavidDymaxion   It does things you can't do (braking on just o...   Apr 7 2007, 04:08 AM
z28jeff   QUOTE (DavidDymaxion @ Apr 6 2007, 10:08 ...   Apr 9 2007, 02:45 PM
2000Z-71   QUOTE (z28jeff @ Apr 9 2007, 09:45 AM) QU...   Apr 16 2007, 09:44 PM
poSSum   QUOTE (slowTA @ Apr 6 2007, 07:08 PM) Wou...   Apr 7 2007, 03:52 PM
RedHardSupra   so you minimize the changes it can do, kinda like ...   Apr 7 2007, 08:44 PM
35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS   Corvettes have had active handling for years. When...   Apr 7 2007, 09:35 PM
rushman   I don't know, once they roll over they tend to...   Apr 8 2007, 12:32 AM
BigEnos   I instructed at a M-Benz track day for AMG cars (b...   Apr 9 2007, 01:07 PM
poSSum   QUOTE (BigEnos @ Apr 9 2007, 08:07 AM) Th...   Apr 9 2007, 01:24 PM
BigEnos   QUOTE (poSSum @ Apr 9 2007, 07:24 AM) QUO...   Apr 9 2007, 01:35 PM
trackbird   QUOTE (BigEnos @ Apr 9 2007, 09:07 AM) An...   Apr 9 2007, 02:05 PM
00 SS   I've heard this will be required in the future...   Apr 9 2007, 01:56 PM
pknowles   I can see this happening on trucks, vans, and SUV...   Apr 9 2007, 02:37 PM
Eugenio_SS   QUOTE (pknowles @ Apr 9 2007, 10:37 AM) I...   Apr 9 2007, 03:15 PM
m6t/a   If there wasn't a button to turn off the ...   Dec 27 2007, 07:48 PM
prockbp   I absolutely believe that mandatory traction contr...   Dec 28 2007, 04:47 AM

« Next Oldest · General Discussion · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th June 2025 - 04:21 AM