![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 91 Joined: 27-January 05 Member No.: 626 ![]() |
I'm under the impression you can legally swap a LS1 and the accompanying T56 into an older ('93-'97) 4th Gen Fbody for ESP. So, assuming that is correct what do you think would be the better combo?
* LT4 built to the limits of ESP rules + the '93 Trans gearing or * LS1 built to the limits of ESP rules + '98+ Trans gearing? Let's assume this is in a '97 Hardtop Z28 built to the full limit of ESP rules also. The car generally would run on a large, fast, smooth, ultra-grippy concrete lot. BUT it would hopefully see Nationals in the next 2-3 years so it'd need to work on smaller, slippery surfaces too. Running the numbers on 2nd gear only (since that’s where the car will spend at least 90% of it’s AutoX time) the ’93 Trans gearing would give about a 14% increase in RPM vs. the ‘94+. For example, if the ‘94+ gearing would have you at 3,000 RPM the ’93 would have you at 3,420 RPM. I think it’s safe to say that the LT4 can match the LS1 on torque/hp until maybe 4500 or 5000 RPM. Only losing out a bit right up to ~6200-6300. But can a LS1 make as much torque/hp at 3,000 RPM as a LT4 could at 3,420 RPM? Thoughts? -TJ PS- Yes, my head hurts too. This post has been edited by tjZ28: Jul 11 2007, 12:53 AM |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Collo Rosso ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,220 Joined: 3-August 05 From: San Antonio, TX Member No.: 839 ![]() |
I don't have a dyno graph as the car is now. It is not even nearly modded to ESP ruleset. It's a 145,000 mile unopened '95 LT1 that has had regular maintenance and has an underdrive pulley, CAI, and C.A.M. tuning. I have the cast iron manifolds and a Stainless works y-pipe/cat with fabulous pieced together cat back.
Ask Phil how it compares with his LS1, he drove his and mine this weekend. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th May 2025 - 02:06 AM |