![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 115 Joined: 4-April 04 Member No.: 296 ![]() |
Take a look and see what's on the horizon:
http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-content/plu...idg=1&idi=1 http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-content/plu...idg=1&idi=2 http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-content/plu...idg=1&idi=3 http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-content/plu...idg=1&idi=4 http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-content/plu...idg=1&idi=5 http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-content/plu...idg=1&idi=6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
I build race cars ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 4,748 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Central coast, CA Member No.: 874 ![]() |
Compared to 4th gen:
shorter overhangs front and rear - good for aero mods and PMI probably longer wheelbase - good smaller, lighter windshield - good smaller, lighter hatch glass, unless the camo is covering an extension to the spoiler - maybe good very short door window openings - bad for quick exit roof appears deeper at top of door glass - good for tucking halo up there |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,528 Joined: 13-January 07 From: Solebury, Pa. Member No.: 1,589 ![]() |
Compared to 4th gen: shorter overhangs front and rear - good for aero mods and PMI probably longer wheelbase - good smaller, lighter windshield - good smaller, lighter hatch glass, unless the camo is covering an extension to the spoiler - maybe good very short door window openings - bad for quick exit roof appears deeper at top of door glass - good for tucking halo up there How much weight do you figure could be pulled out of these things (not that it will help the F/Stockers out there any)?? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
I build race cars ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 4,748 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Central coast, CA Member No.: 874 ![]() |
Compared to 4th gen: shorter overhangs front and rear - good for aero mods and PMI probably longer wheelbase - good smaller, lighter windshield - good smaller, lighter hatch glass, unless the camo is covering an extension to the spoiler - maybe good very short door window openings - bad for quick exit roof appears deeper at top of door glass - good for tucking halo up there How much weight do you figure could be pulled out of these things (not that it will help the F/Stockers out there any)?? My SWAG is the car will be 200-300# heavier than a 4th gen, maybe half of that increase in steel in the chassis for crashworthiness, and the other half in airbags, electronics and creature comforts. Steel stays, geegaws get tossed, race weight ends up 100-150# more than a 4th gen with similar rules. The smaller front/rear glass will mean less weight loss with Lexan. With a 400hp LS3, IRS and enough rubber it should come off the corners well, but give up some in braking and transitions to the lighter cars. Like I said, tho - just my SWAG. I do expect the stamped steel IRS control arms to spawn a race in the aftermarket to get shiny powder coated tubular arms into the marketplace, but what we really need is a DIY aluminum forge ;-) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,528 Joined: 13-January 07 From: Solebury, Pa. Member No.: 1,589 ![]() |
Compared to 4th gen: shorter overhangs front and rear - good for aero mods and PMI probably longer wheelbase - good smaller, lighter windshield - good smaller, lighter hatch glass, unless the camo is covering an extension to the spoiler - maybe good very short door window openings - bad for quick exit roof appears deeper at top of door glass - good for tucking halo up there How much weight do you figure could be pulled out of these things (not that it will help the F/Stockers out there any)?? My SWAG is the car will be 200-300# heavier than a 4th gen, maybe half of that increase in steel in the chassis for crashworthiness, and the other half in airbags, electronics and creature comforts. Steel stays, geegaws get tossed, race weight ends up 100-150# more than a 4th gen with similar rules. The smaller front/rear glass will mean less weight loss with Lexan. With a 400hp LS3, IRS and enough rubber it should come off the corners well, but give up some in braking and transitions to the lighter cars. Like I said, tho - just my SWAG. I do expect the stamped steel IRS control arms to spawn a race in the aftermarket to get shiny powder coated tubular arms into the marketplace, but what we really need is a DIY aluminum forge ;-) COOL! Thanks for the educated speculation!! (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/2thumbs.gif) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th May 2025 - 10:09 PM |