![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,640 Joined: 25-December 03 From: Louisville, KY Member No.: 40 ![]() |
After sunday's autocross a novice asked on our region's message board about getting a cheap helmet. He got replies ranging from links where you could get an M2000 helmet for $60 and one even $49!
The site we raced at sunday was a military air strip with tall grass off the sides. The dirt wasn't always flat and smooth. In fact, yesterday and S2000 went off into the grass sideways-he wasn't the only one to go off into the grass. Now is it just me or this the kind of place where a good possibility of rolling over exists? It just kind of disturbs me that people will recommend and use such cheap helmets. Am I being a little excessive here? What's everyone's opinion on helmets in autocross? |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Seeking round tuits ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 5,522 Joined: 24-December 03 From: Kentucky Member No.: 33 ![]() |
Well, if there's any way for your helmet to hit a rollbar in a crash, you need an SA. Unless all the bars are very far from the helmet, the answer is "probably".
However, it's also worth considering that Snell doesn't require flame-retardant linings in M2000, only SA2000. I would really like to see the standards merge. I want the M peripheral vision (accident AVOIDANCE) with the SA rollbar test and flame retardancy. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st June 2025 - 10:21 AM |