IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
UMI PerformanceUnbalanced EngineeringHotpart.comSolo PerformanceBlaine Fabrication.com
> New Economy and Emissions Standards, 1973 all over again?
KeithO
post May 19 2009, 04:59 PM
Post #1


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,647
Joined: 23-December 03
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Member No.: 14



The supposed standards about to be enacted might make performance cars more difficult to get for a while. I am wondering if we aren't looking at new-car performance similar to what we saw from 1973 through around 1987...

This is just more motivation for me to maintain my f-body.

Do you guys think that we will be able to achieve this? Regardless, how slow do you think new cars will get before performance returns?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
trackbird
post May 20 2009, 02:31 PM
Post #2


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



I think you'd be farther ahead to implement a yearly gas guzzler tax. I'm not suggesting that I'm in favor of this, but raising fuel taxes will kill the trucking industry (maybe Andy J will drop in here with more on this). But taxing the "idiots" (like me) who drive a 12 mpg 1 ton to work in downtown everyday would have an effect. Now, I need my truck to tow, and my post divorce budget won't really support a second vehicle for commuting and the insurance to go with it (that cuts into the already slim racing budget), so I drive my truck. But, if they taxed us based on use...

12,000 miles a year @ 12 mpg is 1,000 gallons of gas. The difference between $2.50 a gallon and $5.00 a gallon is $2.50 (duh). That's $2,500. A $2,500 tax would surely reduce the chances of me driving a 1 ton truck daily. However, to do it properly, you need to GPS the actual mileage of the vehicles (like CA has proposed) and tax you on your actual use. Or, do a once a year mileage inspection where you drop by and they log the mileage against the odometer reading from last year. WV state inspection already logs the mileage on the car at each inspection. It would be easy (in that state, and probably many others) to just log it and bill accordingly. If you tow 50k a year, bring your visa card. If you only tow to local events (50 miles or so) a few times a year, you probably won't really notice the tax. Exempt the trucking industry and businesses (Joe's lawncare will likely go under if they have to pay that on their fleet, and it will hurt utilities pretty bad as well). At that point, I'll just register my truck to frrax and make racing a business (as will many others)...

With all that said, I think it makes far more sense than taxing fuel to $5.00. And, I'd be PISSED if they were to implement it. But if you want to force a fundamental change in the way people use their vehicles, that would surely do it. And, it would do it with far less harm to the cost of goods and services than a straight fuel tax.

That was easy, what other world problems should we fix while we're here? (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bubba353z
post May 20 2009, 03:41 PM
Post #3


Member
*

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 18-July 04
From: Columbus, Ohio
Member No.: 410



QUOTE (trackbird @ May 20 2009, 10:31 AM) *
I'm not suggesting that I'm in favor of this, but raising fuel taxes will kill the trucking industry


Really the major effect will be on the owner operators, who don't get a 100% pass-through on the fuel surcharges that the carrier charges. Back when diesel was $4.50+ per gallon, surcharges were running us 40%+ above the base rate on a shipment. The less than honorable brokers were skimming some/most of that extra charge and not passing it along to the people that were actually buying the fuel.

Ultimately we'll pay for it in higher cost of goods - however they decide to collect the $.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
KeithO   New Economy and Emissions Standards   May 19 2009, 04:59 PM
trackbird   The Corvette can do it, or get really close (not s...   May 19 2009, 05:05 PM
CMC#5   I have no idea why in a country with as many intel...   May 19 2009, 06:13 PM
trackbird   Yea, but if you tax fuel to $5 a gallon, you...   May 19 2009, 06:56 PM
mitchntx   Al works in the petroleum industry ... of course h...   May 19 2009, 07:13 PM
00 SS   Well let's take a broader look at this. Right...   May 19 2009, 07:51 PM
00 Trans Ram   stupid - but I don't much care.There is no car...   May 19 2009, 08:35 PM
StanIROCZ   The good thing about this is that cars are going t...   May 19 2009, 08:50 PM
nape   As a middle leaning Democrat, I think I need to ru...   May 20 2009, 03:58 AM
prockbp   39 mpg for cars by 2016.... What is the problem w...   May 20 2009, 06:28 AM
Todd   QUOTE (prockbp @ May 20 2009, 02:28 AM) 3...   May 20 2009, 02:14 PM
CMC#5   I only used the Prius and Fiesta as examples of US...   May 20 2009, 02:07 PM
mitchntx   QUOTE (CMC#5 @ May 20 2009, 09:07 AM) Tax...   May 20 2009, 04:21 PM
trackbird   I think you'd be farther ahead to implement a ...   May 20 2009, 02:31 PM
bubba353z   QUOTE (trackbird @ May 20 2009, 10:31 AM)...   May 20 2009, 03:41 PM
00 Trans Ram   I don't get it. The overall environmental impa...   May 20 2009, 02:38 PM
KeithO   I guess I have a unique perspective. I think this...   May 20 2009, 02:49 PM
TOO Z MAXX   QUOTE (KeithO @ May 20 2009, 09:49 AM) I ...   May 25 2009, 11:20 PM
00 SS   Keith, I wouldn't call that opinion unique. I...   May 20 2009, 03:09 PM
sgarnett   I'm becoming ever more convinced that "fr...   May 20 2009, 04:08 PM
CMC#5   No worries Mitch, I know you're easily confuse...   May 20 2009, 05:18 PM
sgarnett   Somewhere between Chicken Little and the Grasshopp...   May 27 2009, 11:41 AM
sgarnett   Al, I'm not even suggesting anything as lofty ...   May 28 2009, 11:22 AM
tx_warrior   QUOTE (sgarnett @ May 28 2009, 06:22 AM) ...   May 28 2009, 02:46 PM
sgarnett   QUOTE (tx_warrior @ May 28 2009, 10:46 AM...   May 28 2009, 03:03 PM
c4racer   And of course, we wouldn't want to do anything...   Jun 4 2009, 05:56 AM
sgarnett   What happened? Oil was cheap for a few months. Tha...   Jun 4 2009, 11:20 AM
cccbock   QUOTE (sgarnett @ Jun 4 2009, 07:20 AM) W...   Jun 4 2009, 01:00 PM
mitchntx   QUOTE (cccbock @ Jun 4 2009, 08:00 AM) I ...   Jun 4 2009, 01:35 PM
cccbock   For electric power, I think nuclear and solar are ...   Jun 4 2009, 02:07 PM
CMC#5   Ideally we'd want to be the first to not requi...   Jun 4 2009, 12:51 PM
c4racer   I think the most chilling view into the future of ...   Jun 4 2009, 04:06 PM
Eskimo   QUOTE (c4racer @ Jun 4 2009, 12:06 PM) Wh...   Jun 4 2009, 06:42 PM
KeithO   Eskimo - That was part of the reason that I starte...   Jun 4 2009, 07:14 PM
cccbock   QUOTE (KeithO @ Jun 4 2009, 03:14 PM) Esk...   Jun 5 2009, 03:58 PM
sgarnett   I see a lot of auto parts in my future, but no new...   Jun 4 2009, 11:26 PM
CMC#5   The glass is half full The glass is half empty The...   Jun 5 2009, 08:35 PM
Mojave   QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Jun 5 2009, 03:35 PM) The ...   Jun 6 2009, 01:12 AM
mitchntx   QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Jun 5 2009, 03:35 PM) The ...   Jun 6 2009, 02:03 AM
sgarnett   There is something good that comes from mpg - ligh...   Jun 5 2009, 10:38 PM
sgarnett   Isn't Formula One using regenerative braking n...   Jun 6 2009, 02:18 AM
Mojave   QUOTE (sgarnett @ Jun 5 2009, 09:18 PM) I...   Jun 6 2009, 05:37 AM

« Next Oldest · General Discussion · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th June 2025 - 11:37 PM