|
||||
May 19 2009, 04:59 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,647 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Pittsburgh, PA Member No.: 14 |
The supposed standards about to be enacted might make performance cars more difficult to get for a while. I am wondering if we aren't looking at new-car performance similar to what we saw from 1973 through around 1987...
This is just more motivation for me to maintain my f-body. Do you guys think that we will be able to achieve this? Regardless, how slow do you think new cars will get before performance returns? |
|
|
|
![]() |
May 20 2009, 02:07 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 902 Joined: 27-January 04 From: Magnolia, Tx. Member No.: 160 |
I only used the Prius and Fiesta as examples of US spec vehicles capable of getting 39mpg. Getting mpg in the 40s, 50s, or 60s is not a problem. You can buy a 65mpg Ford Fiesta right now just about anywhere other than the US. The problem is the fact that the vast majority of people in the US wouldnt buy a car with 0-60 time in the mid teens. Consequently, when the Fiesta goes on sale in the US it wont get anywhere near 65mph, rather more like high 30s.
The bottom line is people buy what they want that they can afford. When fuel prices spiked up last year there was a fundamental shift in this country's desires. Suddenly people wanted fuel efficient cars. SUV sales tanked. The effect was immediate, and only collapsed because fuel dropped to under $2 fairly quickly. The greenies and the government clearly want to reduce energy consumption and improve emissions. Forcing manufacturers to build products people don't want is a backwards way of achieving that. Bump the cost of not being efficient and you'll get the results without the drama. Taxing fuel doesnt help the oil companies since it will drive demand (and therefore total sales) down. |
|
|
|
May 20 2009, 04:21 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Nothing says 'I love you.' like a box of Hydroshoks ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 5,284 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Granbury, TX Member No.: 4 |
|
|
|
|
KeithO New Economy and Emissions Standards May 19 2009, 04:59 PM
trackbird The Corvette can do it, or get really close (not s... May 19 2009, 05:05 PM
CMC#5 I have no idea why in a country with as many intel... May 19 2009, 06:13 PM
trackbird Yea, but if you tax fuel to $5 a gallon, you... May 19 2009, 06:56 PM
mitchntx Al works in the petroleum industry ... of course h... May 19 2009, 07:13 PM
00 SS Well let's take a broader look at this. Right... May 19 2009, 07:51 PM
00 Trans Ram stupid - but I don't much care.There is no car... May 19 2009, 08:35 PM
StanIROCZ The good thing about this is that cars are going t... May 19 2009, 08:50 PM
nape As a middle leaning Democrat, I think I need to ru... May 20 2009, 03:58 AM
prockbp 39 mpg for cars by 2016.... What is the problem w... May 20 2009, 06:28 AM
Todd QUOTE (prockbp @ May 20 2009, 02:28 AM) 3... May 20 2009, 02:14 PM
trackbird I think you'd be farther ahead to implement a ... May 20 2009, 02:31 PM
bubba353z QUOTE (trackbird @ May 20 2009, 10:31 AM)... May 20 2009, 03:41 PM
00 Trans Ram I don't get it. The overall environmental impa... May 20 2009, 02:38 PM
KeithO I guess I have a unique perspective. I think this... May 20 2009, 02:49 PM
TOO Z MAXX QUOTE (KeithO @ May 20 2009, 09:49 AM) I ... May 25 2009, 11:20 PM
00 SS Keith, I wouldn't call that opinion unique. I... May 20 2009, 03:09 PM
sgarnett I'm becoming ever more convinced that "fr... May 20 2009, 04:08 PM
CMC#5 No worries Mitch, I know you're easily confuse... May 20 2009, 05:18 PM
sgarnett Somewhere between Chicken Little and the Grasshopp... May 27 2009, 11:41 AM
sgarnett Al, I'm not even suggesting anything as lofty ... May 28 2009, 11:22 AM
tx_warrior QUOTE (sgarnett @ May 28 2009, 06:22 AM) ... May 28 2009, 02:46 PM
sgarnett QUOTE (tx_warrior @ May 28 2009, 10:46 AM... May 28 2009, 03:03 PM
c4racer And of course, we wouldn't want to do anything... Jun 4 2009, 05:56 AM
sgarnett What happened? Oil was cheap for a few months. Tha... Jun 4 2009, 11:20 AM
cccbock QUOTE (sgarnett @ Jun 4 2009, 07:20 AM) W... Jun 4 2009, 01:00 PM
mitchntx QUOTE (cccbock @ Jun 4 2009, 08:00 AM) I ... Jun 4 2009, 01:35 PM
cccbock For electric power, I think nuclear and solar are ... Jun 4 2009, 02:07 PM
CMC#5 Ideally we'd want to be the first to not requi... Jun 4 2009, 12:51 PM
c4racer I think the most chilling view into the future of ... Jun 4 2009, 04:06 PM
Eskimo QUOTE (c4racer @ Jun 4 2009, 12:06 PM) Wh... Jun 4 2009, 06:42 PM
KeithO Eskimo - That was part of the reason that I starte... Jun 4 2009, 07:14 PM
cccbock QUOTE (KeithO @ Jun 4 2009, 03:14 PM) Esk... Jun 5 2009, 03:58 PM
sgarnett I see a lot of auto parts in my future, but no new... Jun 4 2009, 11:26 PM
CMC#5 The glass is half full
The glass is half empty
The... Jun 5 2009, 08:35 PM
Mojave QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Jun 5 2009, 03:35 PM) The ... Jun 6 2009, 01:12 AM
mitchntx QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Jun 5 2009, 03:35 PM) The ... Jun 6 2009, 02:03 AM
sgarnett There is something good that comes from mpg - ligh... Jun 5 2009, 10:38 PM
sgarnett Isn't Formula One using regenerative braking n... Jun 6 2009, 02:18 AM
Mojave QUOTE (sgarnett @ Jun 5 2009, 09:18 PM) I... Jun 6 2009, 05:37 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th November 2025 - 11:15 AM |