|
||||
May 19 2009, 04:59 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,647 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Pittsburgh, PA Member No.: 14 |
The supposed standards about to be enacted might make performance cars more difficult to get for a while. I am wondering if we aren't looking at new-car performance similar to what we saw from 1973 through around 1987...
This is just more motivation for me to maintain my f-body. Do you guys think that we will be able to achieve this? Regardless, how slow do you think new cars will get before performance returns? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 4 2009, 07:14 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,647 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Pittsburgh, PA Member No.: 14 |
Eskimo - That was part of the reason that I started this post. I was wondering if it weren't 1973 again and it is going to take decades to get back to significant performance vehicles - that's the optimistic view. Or, we've finally challenged engineers with an impractical problem to solve and real performance will be relegated to what is already in existence.
It is possible to come up with a requirement that will permenantly kill (from the perspective of my lifetime) performance cars. If we make CAFE 100mpg, I think that is out of reach. The current values proposed are lower but are they going too far? Time will tell. One thing I am certain of is that we are going to see some wonderful modern versions of things like the K-car, Fairmont, Chevette, and (1975) Civic. I am just wondering for how long or have we really killed it this time. I see alot of turds in my future. This post has been edited by KeithO: Jun 4 2009, 07:16 PM |
|
|
|
Jun 5 2009, 03:58 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 934 Joined: 7-March 06 Member No.: 1,113 |
Eskimo - That was part of the reason that I started this post. I was wondering if it weren't 1973 again and it is going to take decades to get back to significant performance vehicles - that's the optimistic view. Or, we've finally challenged engineers with an impractical problem to solve and real performance will be relegated to what is already in existence. It is possible to come up with a requirement that will permenantly kill (from the perspective of my lifetime) performance cars. If we make CAFE 100mpg, I think that is out of reach. The current values proposed are lower but are they going too far? Time will tell. One thing I am certain of is that we are going to see some wonderful modern versions of things like the K-car, Fairmont, Chevette, and (1975) Civic. I am just wondering for how long or have we really killed it this time. I see alot of turds in my future. I used to feel like you guys....ie they will kill our hobby. I grew up in the 8 mpg era for performance cars...and that was highway mileage! I think technology will overcome a lot of our concerns...but it might not look like something we are familiar with today. EFI scared the hell out of me when i first looked at it. Now...well its old hat. My 383 powered Z28 puts 450hp to the wheels at WOT, but got 26mpg driving home from the races. This was unheard of prior to 1990. Impossible they said at the time. I think we have a lot to look forward to. bock |
|
|
|
KeithO New Economy and Emissions Standards May 19 2009, 04:59 PM
trackbird The Corvette can do it, or get really close (not s... May 19 2009, 05:05 PM
CMC#5 I have no idea why in a country with as many intel... May 19 2009, 06:13 PM
trackbird Yea, but if you tax fuel to $5 a gallon, you... May 19 2009, 06:56 PM
mitchntx Al works in the petroleum industry ... of course h... May 19 2009, 07:13 PM
00 SS Well let's take a broader look at this. Right... May 19 2009, 07:51 PM
00 Trans Ram stupid - but I don't much care.There is no car... May 19 2009, 08:35 PM
StanIROCZ The good thing about this is that cars are going t... May 19 2009, 08:50 PM
nape As a middle leaning Democrat, I think I need to ru... May 20 2009, 03:58 AM
prockbp 39 mpg for cars by 2016.... What is the problem w... May 20 2009, 06:28 AM
Todd QUOTE (prockbp @ May 20 2009, 02:28 AM) 3... May 20 2009, 02:14 PM
CMC#5 I only used the Prius and Fiesta as examples of US... May 20 2009, 02:07 PM
mitchntx QUOTE (CMC#5 @ May 20 2009, 09:07 AM) Tax... May 20 2009, 04:21 PM
trackbird I think you'd be farther ahead to implement a ... May 20 2009, 02:31 PM
bubba353z QUOTE (trackbird @ May 20 2009, 10:31 AM)... May 20 2009, 03:41 PM
00 Trans Ram I don't get it. The overall environmental impa... May 20 2009, 02:38 PM
KeithO I guess I have a unique perspective. I think this... May 20 2009, 02:49 PM
TOO Z MAXX QUOTE (KeithO @ May 20 2009, 09:49 AM) I ... May 25 2009, 11:20 PM
00 SS Keith, I wouldn't call that opinion unique. I... May 20 2009, 03:09 PM
sgarnett I'm becoming ever more convinced that "fr... May 20 2009, 04:08 PM
CMC#5 No worries Mitch, I know you're easily confuse... May 20 2009, 05:18 PM
sgarnett Somewhere between Chicken Little and the Grasshopp... May 27 2009, 11:41 AM
sgarnett Al, I'm not even suggesting anything as lofty ... May 28 2009, 11:22 AM
tx_warrior QUOTE (sgarnett @ May 28 2009, 06:22 AM) ... May 28 2009, 02:46 PM
sgarnett QUOTE (tx_warrior @ May 28 2009, 10:46 AM... May 28 2009, 03:03 PM
c4racer And of course, we wouldn't want to do anything... Jun 4 2009, 05:56 AM
sgarnett What happened? Oil was cheap for a few months. Tha... Jun 4 2009, 11:20 AM
cccbock QUOTE (sgarnett @ Jun 4 2009, 07:20 AM) W... Jun 4 2009, 01:00 PM
mitchntx QUOTE (cccbock @ Jun 4 2009, 08:00 AM) I ... Jun 4 2009, 01:35 PM
cccbock For electric power, I think nuclear and solar are ... Jun 4 2009, 02:07 PM
CMC#5 Ideally we'd want to be the first to not requi... Jun 4 2009, 12:51 PM
c4racer I think the most chilling view into the future of ... Jun 4 2009, 04:06 PM
Eskimo QUOTE (c4racer @ Jun 4 2009, 12:06 PM) Wh... Jun 4 2009, 06:42 PM
sgarnett I see a lot of auto parts in my future, but no new... Jun 4 2009, 11:26 PM
CMC#5 The glass is half full
The glass is half empty
The... Jun 5 2009, 08:35 PM
Mojave QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Jun 5 2009, 03:35 PM) The ... Jun 6 2009, 01:12 AM
mitchntx QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Jun 5 2009, 03:35 PM) The ... Jun 6 2009, 02:03 AM
sgarnett There is something good that comes from mpg - ligh... Jun 5 2009, 10:38 PM
sgarnett Isn't Formula One using regenerative braking n... Jun 6 2009, 02:18 AM
Mojave QUOTE (sgarnett @ Jun 5 2009, 09:18 PM) I... Jun 6 2009, 05:37 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th October 2026 - 07:53 PM |