And that's part of my point, are Z28's and Corvettes not "abused"?? Do they go searching the internet for people that autocross or drag race our cars?? Were they not designed with those possibilities in mind? Sure if you keep coming back in with obvious "self destructing" parts I can understand not fixing it under warranty. But you don't sell a performance car and think that no one is going to drive it hard.
I could take an Evo on the Tail of the Dragon (
http://www.tailofthedragon.com ) and abuse it more than any autocross, 318 turns in 11 miles and still run under the 55 mph speed limit is alot more abusive than any autox I've driven ever driven yet would still not be on a track and not exceeding the speed limit. Isn't that was this car was designed to do???? Would they try to deny my warranty claim??
Let's face it, the cars are defective right off the showroom floor. NOTHING should break as easily as they do. Now they're trying to cover up and claim that everyone is abusing a vehicle that was marketed as a race and track ready car.