|
||||
Feb 8 2011, 03:10 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Zero brand loyalty ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 645 Joined: 22-January 04 From: Merryland Member No.: 145 |
Kicking around the idea of a track/time trial car and have been thinking about a V6 F Body. Of course an LT1 or LS1 car would be faster but I don't think there's anything but catch-all classes for them, at least for the SCCA. And A Sedan looks to be more than just a bolt-on class. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) However, the SCCA has classed the 1996-2002 in ITR, and I figured something built for a specific class would be better down the road in case I want to sell it.
Anyway, 1987-1992 305 F Bodies are also in ITR, but you can't run 1LE stuff (namely brakes), and minimum weight is 3,465. V6 cars can run the "LS1" brakes and minimum weight is 2,815. I figure rollcage, Konis, Strano springs and bar and onto a good start for a cheap track car. Looking around on the internet, it appears all the 96-02 cars are pretty much the same under the skin, other than brakes. ??? Anybody have some insight? Pat |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 8 2011, 10:13 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
I build race cars ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 4,748 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Central coast, CA Member No.: 874 |
Kicking around the idea of a track/time trial car and have been thinking about a V6 F Body. Of course an LT1 or LS1 car would be faster but I don't think there's anything but catch-all classes for them, at least for the SCCA. And A Sedan looks to be more than just a bolt-on class. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) However, the SCCA has classed the 1996-2002 in ITR, and I figured something built for a specific class would be better down the road in case I want to sell it. Anyway, 1987-1992 305 F Bodies are also in ITR, but you can't run 1LE stuff (namely brakes), and minimum weight is 3,465. V6 cars can run the "LS1" brakes and minimum weight is 2,815. I figure rollcage, Konis, Strano springs and bar and onto a good start for a cheap track car. Looking around on the internet, it appears all the 96-02 cars are pretty much the same under the skin, other than brakes. ??? Anybody have some insight? Pat The early (93-97) V6 cars came with drum brakes on the rear. There was a V6 motor upgrade sometime in the LT1 era. Disc rear may have been an option but I think they became std after 98. The V6 came with a T5 trans, there is a good thread on the T5 variants somewhere here on frrax. The suspension (other than spring and damping rates) and chassis are the same. Is the 2815 weight with driver? That I don't think is possible under IT rules, the V6/T5 is not going to weigh 400# less than the LT1/T56. CMC is a little more open than IT and the CMC LT1 cars are right around 3000# w/o driver. If it's 2815 w/o driver then you'll get closer to min. |
|
|
|
patred Learn me V6 F Bodies Feb 8 2011, 03:10 PM
zlexiss In '99 they moved to the electronic throttle b... Feb 8 2011, 04:26 PM
patred QUOTE (zlexiss @ Feb 8 2011, 11:26 AM) In... Feb 11 2011, 03:23 PM
zlexiss QUOTE (patred @ Feb 11 2011, 08:23 AM) QU... Feb 15 2011, 11:02 PM
CamaroFS34 QUOTE (patred @ Feb 11 2011, 11:23 AM) QU... Feb 28 2011, 04:29 AM
GlennCMC70 QUOTE (Blainefab @ Feb 8 2011, 04:13 PM) ... Feb 8 2011, 10:25 PM
firehawkclone I think 93/97 are 3.4l and 98/02 are 3.8l. Try loo... Feb 16 2011, 10:53 AM
Sidney QUOTE (patred @ Feb 8 2011, 09:10 AM) Kic... Feb 16 2011, 02:39 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th November 2026 - 12:34 AM |