![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 115 Joined: 7-March 07 Member No.: 1,712 ![]() |
Just curious how some of the older stock/race f-bodies vettes out there compare to newer cars. I know there are lots of factors that would offset times but for shits and giggles....
I took a few from motortrends site.. 2010 Dodge Viper ACR - 1:33.92 2009 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 - 1:35.83 2009 Nissan GT-R - 1:40.45 2008 BMW M3 - 1:42.96 2010 Ford Shelby GT500 - 1:44.32 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS - 1:45.72 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X MR - 1:47.7... 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS - 1:47.75 2009 Mazda RX-8 - 1:50.42 2006 Honda Civic Si - 1:54.99 Source |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 222 Joined: 14-January 07 From: Brunswick, GA Member No.: 1,590 ![]() |
Just curious how some of the older stock/race f-bodies vettes out there compare to newer cars. I know there are lots of factors that would offset times but for shits and giggles.... I took a few from motortrends site.. 2010 Dodge Viper ACR - 1:33.92 2009 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 - 1:35.83 2009 Nissan GT-R - 1:40.45 2008 BMW M3 - 1:42.96 2010 Ford Shelby GT500 - 1:44.32 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS - 1:45.72 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X MR - 1:47.7... 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS - 1:47.75 2009 Mazda RX-8 - 1:50.42 2006 Honda Civic Si - 1:54.99 Source In my T1 Corvette (dynojet proved 340 rwhp couple days before the race) I ran a 1:40.1 (2/10's off the t1 track record) in the race in traffic. The car is good for ~ a low :37 with good conditions and no traffic |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd May 2025 - 07:52 AM |