![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,647 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Pittsburgh, PA Member No.: 14 ![]() |
There was an article in the printed version (I didn't see it on the website) reporting on people having their warranties voided when they go in for service and the dealer finds out that the owner has been autocrossing. The case-in-point was an Evo owner that ran the car in the local SCCA region. When he took the car in for repairs (admittedly significant), they told him that they knew he was autocrossing it (they wouldn't tell him how they knew) and that he was going to have to pay out-of-pocket for the repairs - $7k.
They also discussed the situation with Subaru where you get a year's SCCA membership with the purchase of a WRX so that you can "experience the full potential of your car". In the grand scheme of things, I suppose this is fair, but it is something to keep in mind. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Moderator ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 863 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Tulsa, OK Member No.: 5 ![]() |
QUOTE (Eugenio_SS @ Jul 13 2004, 06:42 PM) imho, if a company decides to void a warranty, they should at least refund the value of the warranty left to the owner. For sure there are figures on how much does warranty cost on average per vehicule, and the companies take that into account on the purchase price. Having said that, if the company has the "choice" to void the warranty, the owners should have the same "choice" to void the payment on the warranty. I would buy a Vette with a 8,000$ discount if it had no warranty. I agree 100%. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th May 2025 - 01:19 AM |