![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,290 Joined: 4-May 04 From: Kenvil, NJ Member No.: 331 ![]() |
So here is my post from 2014, where I shared pictures of my cross member idea.
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?sho...40&start=40 See post #70. And here are pictures from the DSE Facebook post from 2016. https://photos.app.goo.gl/56FMzxn7UwXz3UzX2 I'm thinking the main part that separates these 2 cross members from all the ohers is that they both relocated the mounting location back a few inches instead of making a huge lever off of the factory location. I know I've seen a few T56 cross members that have double humps for the exhaust so that isn't anything new and they made a more elegant arc, (which they better, mine is ugly) so I'm not going to complain there. But if that is a C channel they used it will collect a bunch of debris! If they did copy me I'll just take it as a compliment! |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 3,897 Joined: 3-July 04 From: Pearland, Texas Member No.: 385 ![]() |
FSCKERS. Looks a lot like the crossmember I had fabbed so I could mount the TH350, crossmember-mounted T/A mount, and still get an exhaust under the car. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)
(IMG:https://media.fotki.com/2v22k9fCjxJDYiP.jpg) This post has been edited by CrashTestDummy: Feb 6 2018, 03:17 AM |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th August 2025 - 12:55 AM |