[Chris 96 WS6]

Below you will see a link to a post that was supposed to be discussing the next Camaro. However, I seem to be butting heads with the guy named IZ28 that seems hellbent on proving the IROC-Z is a better handling car than any 4th gen ever made.

I find this very hard to believe considering the improvements in the 4th gen front suspension plus the availablility of 17" tires later on. He's quoting imaginary kid pad numbers like they are gospel.

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread....d=1#post2354233

If anybody is interested, I could use some fact-based assistance. He claims 3rd gens still dominate F-stock to this day...I kinda find this hard to believe.

Not that I am anti-thirdgen, I've owned two of them, including an IROC, so don't take my opposition to this guy the wrong way. I just don't agree with his "facts."

[RegaMaro]

I wouldn't waste your time Chris. Like it's already been said, each generation of Camaro has their pro's and con's over each other. I think if you kept the conversation specific to something like what car is best for F-Stock it might be a worthwhile discussion. Otherwise it's really just opinion IMO (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

Besides... all our cars are anything but new now. Especially an IROC which is at least 15yrs old. How well does Johnny IROC over there think his 15yr stock springs and shocks are still performing. Or are we not talking stock anymore? Just too many variables. The IROC was one of the greatest handling cars back in the day :leaving: but that was 15yrs ago... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/nutkick.gif)

These smilies are fun (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)