IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Unbalanced EngineeringHotpart.comBlaine Fabrication.comSolo PerformanceUMI Performance
> Info on SLP "jounce spacers"
ESPCamaro
post Nov 1 2004, 06:00 PM
Post #1


No El-Use-O.
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,368
Joined: 27-December 03
From: SW Michigan
Member No.: 52



How thick are the spacers that SLP installed on the SS cars?

And because of their location, one would have to raise the rear of the car MORE than the thickness of the spacer to maintain the same travel as before the spacer. Isn't that correct?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
ESPCamaro
post Nov 6 2004, 03:49 AM
Post #2


No El-Use-O.
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,368
Joined: 27-December 03
From: SW Michigan
Member No.: 52



QUOTE (sgarnett @ Nov 5 2004, 01:09 PM)
The stock bumpstop is fairly close to the wheel. You will get a little more travel at the outer edge of the tire in roll, but assuming the PHR and roll center is roughly on the same level as the axle, the outer edge travel will be roughly (travel at bumpstop)*(distance from outer face of tire to center of pumpkin)/(distance from bumpstop to center of pumpkin).


Lonnie, if you have to raise the tail of the car 1/2" to clear the 335s, it doesn't seem like that great an idea. You're going to raise the CG and (ignoring whatever other plans you have) the roll center. Even if you fix the roll center, raising the CG will probably cancel out most of the advantage of the wider tires.



Thanks. Looks like I have some measuring to do.

Sean if I raise the car up 1/2" ('maybe' less) I will still be slightly lower than stock. And my rear control arm angles will be "better". Roll center isn't a big deal. As next year progresses I'll look into the PHR brackets more and more. They ARE in my future.


The more I think about the things my car did, and what I would like to change, I'm about 98% confident the car will be faster. I know I will be faster in it. But am 98% sure it'll be faster regardless who is driving.

The other 2% of question is because of the added width.

Regarding the load transfer aspect of the higher C/G height, I would think that the extra 1-1/4" width on each side would cancel that out...???
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
ESPCamaro   Info on SLP "jounce spacers"   Nov 1 2004, 06:00 PM
z28barnett   Spacers are 15mm thick. They are under the bump...   Nov 1 2004, 06:39 PM
LT4Firehawk   You don't need them unless you are really low....   Nov 1 2004, 07:35 PM
ESPCamaro   I'm planning to use them (or something similar...   Nov 1 2004, 07:48 PM
z28barnett   QUOTE (ESPCamaro @ Nov 1 2004, 01:48 PM)I...   Nov 5 2004, 05:19 PM
sgarnett   The stock bumpstop is fairly close to the wheel. Y...   Nov 5 2004, 07:09 PM
ESPCamaro   QUOTE (sgarnett @ Nov 5 2004, 01:09 PM)The st...   Nov 6 2004, 03:49 AM
pknowles   I don't see why you would want to take travel ...   Nov 6 2004, 01:38 PM
ESPCamaro   QUOTE (pknowles @ Nov 6 2004, 07:38 AM)I don...   Nov 6 2004, 02:07 PM
pknowles   QUOTE About 26-1/4" in front (after I lower i...   Nov 6 2004, 02:17 PM

« Next Oldest · General Discussion · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th May 2025 - 03:58 PM