![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 297 Joined: 14-February 04 Member No.: 203 ![]() |
I intended to post this Thursday night but I figured I would put out a little teaser.
My car is going on the dyno Thursday for it's tune with the new setup. I'm geeked! I've been running a base tune that they put in last fall. Car feels very good/strong. Here's a few pics. (IMG:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v294/Redbird1/engine/e1dc9395.jpg) (IMG:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v294/Redbird1/engine/08a5ae20.jpg) (IMG:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v294/Redbird1/engine/b9d73198.jpg) GMHTP had a 383 with ported stock heads put down (uncorrected) 448.5 at the crank. I have AFR190 street port. Not sure if this is better or worse than the ported stocks. Find out Thursday. My hope when I started this was 400 HP at the wheels. Wish me luck. Steve |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 297 Joined: 14-February 04 Member No.: 203 ![]() |
QUOTE (mitchntx @ Apr 16 2005, 17:42) Mustang Dynos ALWAYS dyno lower than Dynojet dynos. You very well may be approaching 400rwhp ... on a Dynojet ... This is exactly what the dyno guys told me. They said they have done tests on both machines and have seen as much as 30 HP swings. So I asked him, "which one was correct". He started into some shpeel about neither dyno being wrong. In my eyes there can only be one correct answer as to how much HP a motor is making. I don't remember the numbers, but he told me I was above any stock C5 Z06 they have tested. Especially in the torque. That's nice to know. I'm not really to worried about the numbers. The cars plenty fast for me right now. I am going to look into the springs though, just for piece of mind. Steve |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th August 2025 - 08:57 PM |