[rpoz-29]

Don't laugh. A thread that started on my club's website about the best drivers, turned into a discussion about motorcycle racing being safer that auto racing. The antagonist said that he raced bikes for a while, and that since force =mass x acceleration, once you're off the bike you'll slow down faster, thus come to rest sooner. Maybe if every wreck went into a gravel trap, I'd understand, but am I missing something? I think solid object impact on a super bike at speed sounds a bit more painful than being strapped in. The only bike racing I can claim to are some hare scrambles back in the '70's. He says the stats are there to prove bike racing is safer, but he never showed where to find them. Then he got a little snippy, and said he was trying to "enlighten" us, and was sorry he wasted his time. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

[nape]

My cousin races bikes and he's had a few offs, only broke a couple toes if I remember right.

One time that I was at his house, we watched a DVD about MotoGP and at the amount of injuries and broken bones those guys had, I really doubt it's safer then racing a car.

Maybe less fatalities if you only look at fatalities, but definately not "safer" IMO.