[GlennCMC70]

read the whole thread. about half way thru some of you may realize i'm not really looking for new wheels. i'm more concerned about the rule changes after the fact.
to fill in the missing info. a local CMC guy bought a set of Forgline's (1 piece RS's i think) for his car. they where deemed illegal after the price and weight were known by the directors. they do follow the written rule, but seemed to not follow the intent. i'm not trying to start a war w/ this post, so if you think that, don't. but i do want some CONSTRUCTIVE feedback whether it be for or against me. i'm also not looking for people to post in the thread there, just wanted to prompt some jabber back and forth here.
i still think a limit on wheel weight is a good idea, just not after the fact. lets keep this one friendly. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


http://www.camaromustangchallenge.com/cmcb...opic.php?t=1387

[Pilot]

Glenn, no need for deletion, I just saw it right now. I'm not a CMC'er... or even a road courser... yet... but I agree completely with you and Lewis. If they're going to limit the weights on the wheels, then don't screw with the costs. If you're going to screw with the costs, don't screw with the weights. I personally think that limiting max/min wheel weights is a much more fair way of regulating the series.

Tony wants to keep CMC from becoming a checkbook series and I think limiting the wheel weights can do that. That way, someone can spend under x dollars to get a minimum weight wheel, and if someone else wants, they can spend the extra and have a better looking/more durable/made of unobtainum/whatever you want wheel that weighs exactly the same. Limiting price by itself is kinda sketchy, but limiting price by limiting part specifications is more logical.