 93 octane in Denver? |
|
|||||||||
 Dec 13 2005, 04:07 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Chapter 11 Racing  Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,166 Joined: 15-February 04 From: Houston, Republic of Texas Member No.: 207  |
seems like stupid question, but Topeka sure as heck didn't have any 93.
|
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
|
Dec 14 2005, 08:29 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Experienced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,197 Joined: 13-February 04 From: Hudson, Colorado Member No.: 197 |
QUOTE (Rob Hood @ Dec 13 2005, 00:00) I didn't think they had that high of octane at that elevation. Maybe 89 is the highest? Check this story out though - http://www.koaa.com/news/view.asp?ID=251 Thats an interesting article, but as usual the news has failed to back up their own claims. It's funny that the oil and gas folks couldn't back their assertions up either. I would think it would be pretty easy to baffle the reporter with some of the very info in this thread and make him think there is a very sound reason for lower octane at altitude even if the automakers don't seem to agree. The bottom line is if your engine is not knocking or pinging and you have no knock retard, you don't need more octane. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS 93 octane in Denver? Dec 13 2005, 04:07 AM
Rob Hood I didn't think they had that high of octane at... Dec 13 2005, 06:00 AM Sam Strano Lat time I was there 91 was it because of the alti... Dec 13 2005, 06:02 PM trackbird Thinner air reduces the filling of the cylinders, ... Dec 13 2005, 06:16 PM 35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS Yeah, but with a "mass" airflow sensor d... Dec 13 2005, 10:59 PM trackbird QUOTE (35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS @ Dec 13... Dec 13 2005, 11:22 PM 35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS the lower compression ratio is really a misnomer. ... Dec 14 2005, 01:42 AM trackbird Right. We are actually discussing dynamic compress... Dec 14 2005, 03:22 AM 00 SS I've never gone through all the thermochemistr... Dec 14 2005, 04:26 PM trackbird QUOTE (00 SS @ Dec 14 2005, 11:26)Maybe you g... Dec 14 2005, 05:41 PM 00 SS Interesting. I thought the vapor pressure determi... Dec 14 2005, 06:11 PM trackbird QUOTE (00 SS @ Dec 14 2005, 13:11)Interesting... Dec 14 2005, 06:54 PM trackbird QUOTE (00 SS @ Dec 14 2005, 15:29)The bottom ... Dec 14 2005, 08:59 PM 35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS I'll run whatever Danny Popp says is okay.... ... Dec 14 2005, 10:31 PM 00 SS QUOTE (35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS @ Dec 14... Dec 14 2005, 10:39 PM Spectator I thought higher octane fuel actually had slightly... Dec 14 2005, 11:09 PM pknowles QUOTE How often you you ever get knocking in moder... Dec 14 2005, 11:13 PM pknowles QUOTE I thought higher octane fuel actually had sl... Dec 14 2005, 11:17 PM Spectator I understand that. I'm talking about the actua... Dec 14 2005, 11:23 PM 35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS QUOTE (00 SS @ Dec 14 2005, 16:39)Correct, bu... Dec 14 2005, 11:39 PM CMC#5 hehe so then why is the max octane in Ca 91 not 93... Dec 16 2005, 04:57 AM trackbird QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Dec 15 2005, 23:57)hehe so the... Dec 16 2005, 05:31 AM 35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS I was thinking it could be something about emissio... Dec 16 2005, 06:09 AM trackbird QUOTE (35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS @ Dec 16... Dec 16 2005, 01:21 PM CMC#5 So you think the CARB (Cal Air Resource Board) is ... Dec 16 2005, 10:10 PM
trackbird QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Dec 16 2005, 17:10)So you thin... Dec 16 2005, 11:12 PM |
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th May 2025 - 04:19 AM |