IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
UMI PerformanceBlaine Fabrication.comUnbalanced EngineeringSolo PerformanceHotpart.com
> 93 octane in Denver?
35th_Anniversary...
post Dec 13 2005, 04:07 AM
Post #1


Chapter 11 Racing
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,166
Joined: 15-February 04
From: Houston, Republic of Texas
Member No.: 207



seems like stupid question, but Topeka sure as heck didn't have any 93.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
trackbird
post Dec 16 2005, 11:12 PM
Post #2


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Dec 16 2005, 17:10)
So you think the CARB (Cal Air Resource Board) is attempting to limit the compression ratio auto manufacturers choose by limiting the octane of available fuel in this gigantor market?

I don't know. It was just a theory from the thinking out loud file. It's not like Colorado where they have altitude to negate the need for it. So, it makes me wonder if they are worried about NOX and compression ratios. I could be crazy, or I might be right. I'd love to know for sure.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS   93 octane in Denver?   Dec 13 2005, 04:07 AM
Rob Hood   I didn't think they had that high of octane at...   Dec 13 2005, 06:00 AM
Sam Strano   Lat time I was there 91 was it because of the alti...   Dec 13 2005, 06:02 PM
trackbird   Thinner air reduces the filling of the cylinders, ...   Dec 13 2005, 06:16 PM
35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS   Yeah, but with a "mass" airflow sensor d...   Dec 13 2005, 10:59 PM
trackbird   QUOTE (35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS @ Dec 13...   Dec 13 2005, 11:22 PM
35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS   the lower compression ratio is really a misnomer. ...   Dec 14 2005, 01:42 AM
trackbird   Right. We are actually discussing dynamic compress...   Dec 14 2005, 03:22 AM
00 SS   I've never gone through all the thermochemistr...   Dec 14 2005, 04:26 PM
trackbird   QUOTE (00 SS @ Dec 14 2005, 11:26)Maybe you g...   Dec 14 2005, 05:41 PM
00 SS   Interesting. I thought the vapor pressure determi...   Dec 14 2005, 06:11 PM
trackbird   QUOTE (00 SS @ Dec 14 2005, 13:11)Interesting...   Dec 14 2005, 06:54 PM
00 SS   QUOTE (Rob Hood @ Dec 13 2005, 00:00)I didn...   Dec 14 2005, 08:29 PM
trackbird   QUOTE (00 SS @ Dec 14 2005, 15:29)The bottom ...   Dec 14 2005, 08:59 PM
35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS   I'll run whatever Danny Popp says is okay.... ...   Dec 14 2005, 10:31 PM
00 SS   QUOTE (35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS @ Dec 14...   Dec 14 2005, 10:39 PM
Spectator   I thought higher octane fuel actually had slightly...   Dec 14 2005, 11:09 PM
pknowles   QUOTE How often you you ever get knocking in moder...   Dec 14 2005, 11:13 PM
pknowles   QUOTE I thought higher octane fuel actually had sl...   Dec 14 2005, 11:17 PM
Spectator   I understand that. I'm talking about the actua...   Dec 14 2005, 11:23 PM
35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS   QUOTE (00 SS @ Dec 14 2005, 16:39)Correct, bu...   Dec 14 2005, 11:39 PM
CMC#5   hehe so then why is the max octane in Ca 91 not 93...   Dec 16 2005, 04:57 AM
trackbird   QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Dec 15 2005, 23:57)hehe so the...   Dec 16 2005, 05:31 AM
35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS   I was thinking it could be something about emissio...   Dec 16 2005, 06:09 AM
trackbird   QUOTE (35th_Anniversary_AS_Camaro_SS @ Dec 16...   Dec 16 2005, 01:21 PM
CMC#5   So you think the CARB (Cal Air Resource Board) is ...   Dec 16 2005, 10:10 PM
trackbird   QUOTE (CMC#5 @ Dec 16 2005, 17:10)So you thin...   Dec 16 2005, 11:12 PM

« Next Oldest · General Discussion · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th May 2025 - 05:08 AM