![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,086 Joined: 16-January 04 From: Chandler AZ Member No.: 130 ![]() |
Not sure who the letter writer is pointing a finger at, but he's definitely pointing a finger...perhaps at NASA?
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 5,226 Joined: 24-December 03 From: Danville, CA, USA Member No.: 27 ![]() |
QUOTE (sgarnett @ Dec 19 2005, 09:30) The letter writer left the SCCA because of all the bureacracy, rules that didn't make sense, and the difficulty of changing them. He tried some other organization that was a lot more progressive and laid back, decided it was too progressive and laid back, and came back to the SCCA. That about is the sum total of my whole feeling on the great "Club Debate"... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) ...only I never left...:leaving: QUOTE There have been a few (very few) good articles in the mag, but they still end up a little fluffy for my taste. I quickly check Fastrack for any interesting new rule changes/proposals/clarifications and maybe drool on the classifieds a bit before giving it to my two-year-old. The whole process takes under 30 seconds, because the section I'm most interested in prints very little of what I'm interested in. Yeah, the mag IS sorta light on the content...I myself just look at the pretty pictures scan the ads and set in on the coffee table until next month... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th August 2025 - 11:21 AM |