IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Solo PerformanceHotpart.comUMI PerformanceBlaine Fabrication.comUnbalanced Engineering
> Letter of the Month, Sports Car Magazine, page 10
Rob Hood
post Dec 19 2005, 06:32 AM
Post #1


Experienced Member
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 16-January 04
From: Chandler AZ
Member No.: 130



Not sure who the letter writer is pointing a finger at, but he's definitely pointing a finger...perhaps at NASA?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
teamDFL
post Dec 21 2005, 06:03 PM
Post #2


Member
*

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 38
Joined: 13-November 05
From: Apex, NC
Member No.: 967



QUOTE (rmackintosh @ Dec 21 2005, 11:42)
QUOTE (Sidney @ Dec 21 2005, 07:57)
Here's a little piece of SCCA vs NASA:

I had raced with Midwestern Council in a class that I helped form that was based on SCCA ASedan rules. The purpose of the rules were to allow racers to run either AS or in MC's AGS class. After a few years my teammate and I were ready to move up to AS as we wanted to run tracks that MC didn't run. Since SCCA is a national organization it seemed like AS was the perfect class.

I posted a question on the ASedan forums about not running race gas and their testing procedures. I run 93 pump gas and didn't want to run expensive race fuel. I was only going to run a few races and didn't care about points. If they tested my fuel and I failed then (which I would have) then I was fine with loosing points and being dq'd. I just want to race at different tracks.

However, the Central Division Chief Steward said that if I was tested before a race, that I could be DQ'd and not allowed to race. Since it's their playground they can make the rules but I chose to play somewhere else. We looked at the American Iron rules and felt we could be competitive with our cars and the more open rules would actually be less expensive then AS should we want to upgrade to be faster.

So far so good!

Sidney

Dunno....rules are rules.....I AM SURE NASA's are more relaxed, but SOMEWHERE, even they will draw the line....if I show up in a Ford model T with paper mache frame rails and a 454 blown Chevy stuffed in it, I bet they would quote me some rules... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) ...

Not to mention a "relaxed" outlook on rules can be good or bad....

I think that the difficulty most people have with any sanctioning body is that if you are a casual competitor, as long as a variance is not a performance advantage, the common belief is that some leeway needs to be given. The idea is often referred to as "the spirit of the rules." If a spec 100 octane gas is required, the spirit of the rules is to limit the amount of octane and/or specific gravity of the fuel. Now, if someone shows up with a fuel that confers no advantage in either case, while they may have broken the letter of the law, they have in no way compromised the spirit. Should this be allowed for someone who is at every race and accumulating points? Probably not. But someone who is no threat to win anything, my opinion is that it lenience should be afforded.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Rob Hood   Letter of the Month   Dec 19 2005, 06:32 AM
mitchntx   I don't subscribe to that rag. I went to the ...   Dec 19 2005, 02:42 PM
robz71lm7   Heh. I'm forced to get it through my SCCA mem...   Dec 19 2005, 02:46 PM
sgarnett   The letter writer left the SCCA because of all the...   Dec 19 2005, 03:30 PM
Rob Hood   Sean paraphrased the letter pretty well, but I...   Dec 19 2005, 05:17 PM
sgarnett   QUOTE (Rob Hood @ Dec 19 2005, 12:17)Sean par...   Dec 19 2005, 06:00 PM
Absolut Speed   Now you guys are going to make me dig that out of ...   Dec 19 2005, 06:55 PM
KeithO   Obviously, this guy didn't run CMC. LOL! ...   Dec 19 2005, 11:50 PM
sgarnett   RE: Letter of the Month   Dec 20 2005, 01:16 PM
rmackintosh   QUOTE (sgarnett @ Dec 19 2005, 09:30)The lett...   Dec 20 2005, 05:08 PM
Sidney   Here's a little piece of SCCA vs NASA: I had ...   Dec 21 2005, 01:57 PM
firehawkclone   QUOTE (robz71lm7 @ Dec 19 2005, 08:46)Heh. I...   Dec 21 2005, 02:40 PM
rmackintosh   QUOTE (Sidney @ Dec 21 2005, 07:57)Here's...   Dec 21 2005, 05:42 PM
teamDFL   QUOTE (rmackintosh @ Dec 21 2005, 11:42)QUOTE...   Dec 21 2005, 06:03 PM
rmackintosh   QUOTE (teamDFL @ Dec 21 2005, 12:03)QUOTE (rm...   Dec 21 2005, 08:30 PM
teamDFL   QUOTE (rmackintosh @ Dec 21 2005, 14:30)The ...   Dec 21 2005, 08:54 PM
Sidney   My '89 Firebird Formula racecar is not a ...   Dec 21 2005, 09:29 PM
rmackintosh   I guess our difference lie in the definition of ...   Dec 21 2005, 09:46 PM
rmackintosh   QUOTE (Sidney @ Dec 21 2005, 15:29)My '89...   Dec 21 2005, 09:49 PM
Sidney   Randy wrote: "I guess our difference lie in t...   Dec 22 2005, 02:07 PM
rmackintosh   QUOTE (Sidney @ Dec 22 2005, 08:07)Randy wrot...   Dec 22 2005, 04:18 PM
Sidney   Isn't this internet thing something special. I...   Dec 22 2005, 06:32 PM
rmackintosh   QUOTE (Sidney @ Dec 22 2005, 12:32)Isn't ...   Dec 22 2005, 07:52 PM
bsim   I hear ya Randy - I wanted to run SCCA - I've ...   Dec 22 2005, 10:21 PM
bsim   BTW - same goes for Corvettes. Where do they fit ...   Dec 22 2005, 10:24 PM
Rob Hood   I'd like to be able to race as much as financi...   Dec 22 2005, 11:09 PM
rmackintosh   QUOTE (Rob Hood @ Dec 22 2005, 17:09)I have b...   Dec 22 2005, 11:50 PM
firehawkclone   QUOTE (rmackintosh @ Dec 22 2005, 17:50)Just ...   Dec 23 2005, 01:51 AM
Rob Hood   QUOTE firehawkclone Posted on Dec 22 2005, 19:51 -...   Dec 23 2005, 07:18 AM

« Next Oldest · General Discussion · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th June 2025 - 11:39 PM