![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 440 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Nashville, TN Member No.: 1 ![]() |
OK guys, the day has come. I've been approached by a vendor to become a sponsor here. You may be familiar with Street Lethal Performance already. David Mercier is who contacted me, and informed me they sell Koni and Ground Control among other things.
In a nutshell, I told David that if we were to bring him on board as a sponsor, it would be with the understanding that SLperf would not be immune to criticisms and they would be responsible for defending themselves and doing right by the customer. There would be no protection or favoritism given to protect the sponsorship income, as it is not essential to maintaining the site. I closed by telling him we would discuss the issue among the members and arrive at a conclusion in the next couple of days. So, I want an honest dialog here and whether you think we should bring in sponsors or not. This one would probably open padora's box. Let me just throw out my thoughts on the subject. Personally I'd like to see sponsorships. I see it as part of the future for the site (which I think can be more than just a board...I see tech articles and such in the future). But anyway, I want to assure you guys as long as I own and maintain the site I will never compromise your ability to speak your mind. Sponsor dollars would/will never get in the way of that, and if it comes down to it I'd rather tell a sponsor to walk than create dissention among the members here. I also think that with the maturity level we have here, big blow ups with sponsors are not likely, but rather would be handled in an adult fashion. So, with that, I'll let you guys hash it out. Whatever I think is the prevailing opinion is what I'll go with, despite my personal preferences. After all, without members, there is no FRRAX.com. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Apex? What apex? ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 245 Joined: 7-January 04 From: Portland, OR Member No.: 106 ![]() |
QUOTE (Glenn98ZM6 @ Mar 16 2004, 12:13 PM) but i do have a problem w/ protecting them because they are a sponsor. prefect example is the BMR PHB failures. there is no way those failures could have been justified or defended. I entirely agree with that, i broke 2 diffrent spohn control arms, at 2 diffrent times. and posted about it on another site, the posts got deleted 3 diffrent times, and i got warned by the site admins for posting a thread that was "talking bad about a sponsor, yo" (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) , it was something i thought was a valid saftey concern, and should have been made a sticky, I did contact Spohn about the failures, and he did a good job of, looking into the failures, and actualy changed his design. but there are probably still many people running that older design, that could have been warned of a potential failure. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2025 - 04:25 PM |