|
||||
Aug 30 2006, 11:29 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,015 Joined: 28-December 03 From: Texas Member No.: 55 |
I seem to recall that max lateral G's of friction is 1 G, and that to go above that adhesion is required.
If true I interpret this to mean that typical street tires would be limited to 1.0 G. Am I nuts, close, or correct? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 31 2006, 12:49 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 919 Joined: 30-December 03 From: Northern NY Member No.: 66 |
I seem to recall that max lateral G's of friction is 1 G, and that to go above that adhesion is required. If true I interpret this to mean that typical street tires would be limited to 1.0 G. Am I nuts, close, or correct? I have seen street tires go over 1g. Just look at what Danny P did. The track was not completely dry either. OLOA 06 Dry skid pad those results were done on a 2 lap average and one of his lap was above 1.12. On street tires that had seen 4500 miles of use. John |
|
|
|
Aug 31 2006, 02:55 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Engine and Tools Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,859 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Lebanon TN Member No.: 6 |
I have seen street tires go over 1g. Just look at what Danny P did. The track was not completely dry either. OLOA 06 Dry skid pad A little off-topic, but I found it interesting that a Viper and a Vette scored below a Grand Cherokee (24th place)... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) On topic, I think one factor is going to be the interaction of irregular surfaces. The rubber can deform into pits/crevices in the track surface and create a bit of a shearing effect on a small scale. |
|
|
|
Aug 31 2006, 03:24 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 919 Joined: 30-December 03 From: Northern NY Member No.: 66 |
I have seen street tires go over 1g. Just look at what Danny P did. The track was not completely dry either. OLOA 06 Dry skid pad A little off-topic, but I found it interesting that a Viper and a Vette scored below a Grand Cherokee (24th place)... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) On topic, I think one factor is going to be the interaction of irregular surfaces. The rubber can deform into pits/crevices in the track surface and create a bit of a shearing effect on a small scale. John you are very observant. Yes certain cars did better than others. Basically it came down to driver at these events. Just because A car is capable of X in a magazine doenst mean that the car owner can reach x also. These events were done with a 2 lap clock/counterclock wise average. Some people have never been on the skid pad before other its there job. I personaly did really good counterclock wise because you can see the edge of the track. I screwed up going clock wise and went a bit wide and lost a ton of time. Spinning the car intenially between a direction change might not of been the best thing to do, because I was laughing like a little kid in my helmet. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) Here's another look at cars during a wet-skid pad, Look what is first a 92 dodge daytona (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif) wet skid pad John This post has been edited by Ojustracing: Aug 31 2006, 03:25 AM |
|
|
|
98_1LE Physics of max lateral G's based on tires Aug 30 2006, 11:29 PM
killer_bluebird I have pulled 1.02g on all season street tires at ... Aug 31 2006, 03:17 AM
Eugenio_SS friction coefficient can be higher than 1.0
coeffi... Sep 1 2006, 04:18 AM
z28tt You can get well over 1g without any type of aerod... Sep 1 2006, 07:35 PM
DavidDymaxion Per g-tech, my 4th gen did 1.03 g (both left and r... Sep 1 2006, 11:27 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th November 2025 - 10:58 PM |