[nape]

Just wondering if there's been a patch to fix the way people were exploiting links in sigs.

I know I learned a lot (and am still doing so) by going through people's sigs and looking through their build pics. A picture is worth a thousand words, as they say.

Just mentioning it because it doesn't seem like enough people will put their site URL in their profile unlike when they could put it in the sig.

[JKnight]

I personally think that smaller sigs are better. I visit some message forums that have pics so large in people's signatures that I can't find the text. I find I don't frequent those boards often as a result. Although I could be in the minority.

Jason

[trackbird]

I personally think that smaller sigs are better. I visit some message forums that have pics so large in people's signatures that I can't find the text. I find I don't frequent those boards often as a result. Although I could be in the minority.

Jason

We'll not be allowing sig pics, that's not going to change. We'll try allowing links to your home page in the sigs for now. I'm still against the "every mod on the car, including my painted air vents" sigs. They are clutter and we don't care about your air vents..... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rant.gif)

[pknowles]

We'll not be allowing sig pics, that's not going to change.

Thank you.

I'm still against the "every mod on the car, including my painted air vents" sigs. They are clutter and we don't care about your air vents..... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rant.gif)

Thank you, again.

I hate boards with sig pics, it clutters up the discussion. Same with long sigs. The worst is when you are tring to search for a topic and you get tons of hits from sigs. So you get threads that have nothing to do with what you are looking for.