IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Hotpart.comSolo PerformanceBlaine Fabrication.comUnbalanced EngineeringUMI Performance
> New Camaro = D.O.A.??
McCall
post Mar 22 2005, 12:11 AM
Post #1


Member
*

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 24-February 05
From: Plano, TX
Member No.: 666



GM pulls plug on '08 line of cars - Product czar Bob Lutz wants to
speed new trucks, SUVs to market faster.
http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosinsider/0.../A01-123402.htm

If the Zeta program is dead, that means the new Camaro/GTO is pretty much dead. Boy those guys at GM are idiots....

McCall
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
ESPCamaro
post Mar 22 2005, 12:27 AM
Post #2


No El-Use-O.
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,368
Joined: 27-December 03
From: SW Michigan
Member No.: 52



QUOTE (McCall @ Mar 21 2005, 06:11 PM)
Boy those guys at GM are idiots....

McCall



What's dumb about concentrating on truck and SUV production when fuel prices are the highest this countries ever seen.

Sounds like perfectly logical thinking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
axoid
post Mar 22 2005, 01:02 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Columbus, OH
Member No.: 70



On fastlane.gmblogs.com Bob posted a follow up to today's the news.
QUOTE
Zeta Not the End of RWD Performance
By Bob Lutz
GM Vice Chairman

Some news broke today about a reshuffling of our product plan, and I just want to clear one thing up before people get carried away.

Yes, we have canceled our plans to build rear-wheel-drive vehicles off the Zeta architecture. But that does not mean we've canceled plans to build rear-drive vehicles altogether.

We did not cancel the Zeta plans to save money, or to divert funds elsewhere that would've been used for product development.

We are simply reallocating resources (human and financial) to pull some other programs ahead and get other vehicles to market sooner. The press speculates this means we're doing it to get our next-generation large SUVs and pickups out sooner. You could see how one might reasonably come to such a conclusion.

Rest assured, we remain committed to developing RWD, premium, high-performance, affordable vehicles, perhaps even a few with a trace of nostalgia baked in.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rushman
post Mar 22 2005, 01:20 AM
Post #4


As fast as poor can be
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 622
Joined: 25-May 04
From: Buffalo, NY
Member No.: 349



QUOTE
perhaps even a few with a trace of nostalgia baked in.


That makes me feel a little better..... unless by nostalgia he means push the 2008 el camino.... I mean SSR
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TOO Z MAXX
post Mar 22 2005, 01:26 AM
Post #5


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 340
Joined: 6-February 04
From: Stockton, California
Member No.: 181



"with a little bit of nostalga baked in" Sounds like they are just dangling that carrot out there to keep us interested.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Absolut Speed
post Mar 22 2005, 02:34 AM
Post #6


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 23-December 03
From: Sterling, IL
Member No.: 7



QUOTE (ESPCamaro @ Mar 21 2005, 06:27 PM)
What's dumb about concentrating on truck and SUV production when fuel prices are the highest this countries ever seen.

Sounds like perfectly logical thinking.

My thoughts exactly. The only way GM should concern itself with trucks and SUV's is if they are building them around alternative fuels.

Insight, Echo, Prius, Civic hybrid, Accord Hybrid, Escape Hybrid = not GM. The Silverado hybrid is a joke. The VUE was delayed. $2.15 in the Midwest per gallon today. That's not changing and apparently, neither is GM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rmackintosh
post Mar 22 2005, 02:58 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
******

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 5,226
Joined: 24-December 03
From: Danville, CA, USA
Member No.: 27



QUOTE (ESPCamaro @ Mar 21 2005, 06:27 PM)
QUOTE (McCall @ Mar 21 2005, 06:11 PM)

  Boy those guys at GM are idiots....

McCall



What's dumb about concentrating on truck and SUV production when fuel prices are the highest this countries ever seen.

Sounds like perfectly logical thinking.

....that really pisses me off.....if there is a good idea...you CAN BET GM will go the OPPOSITE direction...

GM = G&%D#$M MORONS....

(IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Teutonic Speedra...
post Mar 22 2005, 03:07 AM
Post #8


LS1 Inside! / Toolbox / Mechanical Engineer
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,215
Joined: 5-February 04
From: NJ
Member No.: 179



Why can't GM start making cars we want? They need to stop making cars that they think people will want but really don't.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
trackbird
post Mar 22 2005, 04:20 AM
Post #9


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



Damn, we may be FMRRAX.com soon (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/nutkick.gif) (F-body Mustang Road Race Auto-X) because GM is quickly running out of places for us to go (or places for us to "hold out" for) if we want a new toy, unless you are buying a Corvette.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slowTA
post Mar 22 2005, 04:39 AM
Post #10


Experienced Member
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,289
Joined: 4-May 04
From: Kenvil, NJ
Member No.: 331



(IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/bs.gif) :stupid: (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rant.gif) (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/drink.gif) (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/banghead.gif) (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/nutkick.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sgarnett
post Mar 22 2005, 12:17 PM
Post #11


Seeking round tuits
******

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 5,522
Joined: 24-December 03
From: Kentucky
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (axoid @ Mar 21 2005, 08:02 PM)
On fastlane.gmblogs.com Bob posted a follow up to today's the news.
QUOTE
Zeta Not the End of RWD Performance
By Bob Lutz
GM Vice Chairman
...
We did not cancel the Zeta plans to save money, or to divert funds elsewhere that would've been used for product development.

We are simply reallocating resources (human and financial) to pull some other programs ahead and get other vehicles to market sooner.
...

We didn't divert funds, we just reallocated resources. Hmmm (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

Somehow, when I read premium, affordable, high performance, and nostalgia in the same sentence I have trouble reconciling them.

Somehow, I read that as somewhere between an SSR, the new (well, not so new now) T-Bird, and a forced-induction PT Cruiser.

Somehow, I read affordable premium as $40K, not low $20Ks like a minimalist Z28.

Somehow, I read nostalgic performance as a detuned, iron block, 5.3.

Somehow, I read nostalgia baked in as half-baked.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
trackbird
post Mar 22 2005, 01:17 PM
Post #12


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



QUOTE (sgarnett @ Mar 22 2005, 07:17 AM)
We didn't divert funds, we just reallocated resources. Hmmm:rolleyes:

Somehow, when I read premium, affordable, high performance, and nostalgia in the same sentence I have trouble reconciling them.

Somehow, I read that as somewhere between an SSR, the new (well, not so new now) T-Bird, and a forced-induction PT Cruiser.

Somehow, I read affordable premium as $40K, not low $20Ks like a minimalist Z28.

Somehow, I read nostalgic performance as a detuned, iron block, 5.3.

Somehow, I read nostalgia baked in as half-baked.

Somehow....I think you're probably right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tom97ss
post Mar 22 2005, 02:14 PM
Post #13


El Cucci
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 291
Joined: 26-December 03
From: Queen Creek, AZ
Member No.: 46



Nostalgia = Underpowered Cars of the mid to late 70's with lots of stripes and scoops
(IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/nutkick.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
trackbird
post Mar 22 2005, 02:33 PM
Post #14


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



QUOTE (tom97ss @ Mar 22 2005, 09:14 AM)
Nostalgia = Underpowered Cars of the mid to late 70's with lots of stripes and scoops
(IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/nutkick.gif)

Except for underpowered (for a few of them, 4th gen f-bodies and the new GTO's), it sounds like the Pontiac lineup for the last 20 years has already been giving that to us.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AllZWay
post Mar 22 2005, 02:51 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Paris, Texas
Member No.: 74



QUOTE (rmackintosh @ Mar 21 2005, 08:58 PM)
QUOTE (ESPCamaro @ Mar 21 2005, 06:27 PM)
QUOTE (McCall @ Mar 21 2005, 06:11 PM)

  Boy those guys at GM are idiots....

McCall


Sounds like perfectly logical thinking.

....that really pisses me off.....if there is a good idea...you CAN BET GM will go the OPPOSITE direction...

GM = G&%D#$M MORONS....

(IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)

That sure seems to be GM's plan. Let's not build anything but trucks at a time when gas prices are going to slow down truck sales.

I do think GM is being ran by complete idiots.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
y5e06
post Mar 22 2005, 02:58 PM
Post #16


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 951
Joined: 2-January 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 88



ah, just face it. We'll all have to become Ford owners... with a collection of [soon to be] classic chevys in the garage.
(IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2000Z-71
post Mar 22 2005, 05:07 PM
Post #17


Member
*

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 155
Joined: 18-April 04
From: Phoenix, Az.
Member No.: 314



Why do I have a feeling the nostalgia will be a really bad imitation of a '69 Camaro, rolling on a modified Trailblazer frame with the standard 5.3 truck motor priced at 45K?

This is what really pisses me off at GM, they have the potential to build some great performance cars and they choose not to.

How 'bout a no frills stripper budget priced Corvette?

There is the Holden platform available for RWD, it could be built here. Do some restyling for the American market and it would probably sell.

The Caprice/Impala is still being built for oversees markets. Checked on the prices for used Impala SS's lately? There is a market here for them.

Is there any reason there is not a new version of the Syclone? The parts are there it's just a matter of assembling them. Take a basic Canyon, steal the all wheel drive from the Trailblazer, drop in LS-2 from a Corvette, done.

Or how 'bout a new version of the 454 SS pickup. Take basic Silverado 2wd standard cab shortbed, drop in 8.1, sell for 30k or less, done.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
trackbird
post Mar 22 2005, 05:18 PM
Post #18


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



QUOTE (2000Z-71 @ Mar 22 2005, 12:07 PM)
Or how 'bout a new version of the 454 SS pickup. Take basic Silverado 2wd standard cab shortbed, drop in 8.1, sell for 30k or less, done.

Maybe they could make this one fast...... (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rant.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
robz71lm7
post Mar 22 2005, 08:35 PM
Post #19


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,640
Joined: 25-December 03
From: Louisville, KY
Member No.: 40



QUOTE (2000Z-71 @ Mar 22 2005, 12:07 PM)
Why do I have a feeling the nostalgia will be a really bad imitation of a '69 Camaro, rolling on a modified Trailblazer frame with the standard 5.3 truck motor priced at 45K?

This is what really pisses me off at GM, they have the potential to build some great performance cars and they choose not to.

How 'bout a no frills stripper budget priced Corvette?

There is the Holden platform available for RWD, it could be built here. Do some restyling for the American market and it would probably sell.

The Caprice/Impala is still being built for oversees markets. Checked on the prices for used Impala SS's lately? There is a market here for them.

Is there any reason there is not a new version of the Syclone? The parts are there it's just a matter of assembling them. Take a basic Canyon, steal the all wheel drive from the Trailblazer, drop in LS-2 from a Corvette, done.

Or how 'bout a new version of the 454 SS pickup. Take basic Silverado 2wd standard cab shortbed, drop in 8.1, sell for 30k or less, done.

Exactly. They had a nice simple gold silverado SS concept around '99 or '00 with a 6L that ran 13's and used off the shelf parts. Would've been a nice sub 30K truck at the time, instead we got a heavy slow awd truck that isn't good for anything.

The new corvettes are way too expensive as well.

The only thing I like from GM anymore is their trucks-I'm sure that will change soon.

Maybe I'm getting old (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) there just aren't any new cars I like.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bobbylee
post Mar 22 2005, 08:46 PM
Post #20


Member
*

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 185
Joined: 12-July 04
From: Haltom City, TX
Member No.: 396



I've bought my last GM product...That's what I said in '79 too before I bought an F-body. It'll be a long, long time though, if ever. GM does not make anything I am interested in, except a 'Vette, and I doubt I'd ever buy one. I have enough toys and projects to last me forever as it is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · General Discussion · Next Newest »
 

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th May 2025 - 07:49 PM