Dyno numbers! - F-Body Road Racing and Autocross Forums

Posts in this topic

redbird1 Dyno numbers! Apr 13 2005, 12:13 AM

trackbird Very nice, that's almost too pretty to hide un... Apr 13 2005, 01:03 AM

Jon A Good luck! Apr 13 2005, 07:11 PM

bruecksteve That's about what I'm looking for in my bu... Apr 13 2005, 07:59 PM

torontoZ28 that is a beautiful motor - is it from golen? Apr 13 2005, 08:19 PM

redbird1 QUOTE (torontoZ28 @ Apr 13 2005, 14:19)that i... Apr 13 2005, 11:04 PM

Formula WS6 sweet ive been waiting for you to post numbers. im... Apr 13 2005, 11:07 PM

redbird1 Well here we go. The final numbers are in, 370.6R... Apr 14 2005, 10:50 PM

Formula WS6 how does it idle and drive? should do very well wi... Apr 14 2005, 11:02 PM

racerns Are those lift number you give, the lift with the ... Apr 15 2005, 03:50 AM

Jon A Sorry you had disappointing results, Steve. Fir... Apr 15 2005, 09:40 AM

racerns I too noticed the low torque. Just for comparison... Apr 15 2005, 01:33 PM

trax I put down simlar numbers in my car, but with a st... Apr 16 2005, 06:18 PM

redbird1 QUOTE (trax @ Apr 16 2005, 12:18)I put down s... Apr 16 2005, 10:02 PM

redbird1 Here's the graph. I had a guy at work who is ... Apr 16 2005, 10:12 PM

mitchntx Mustang Dynos ALWAYS dyno lower than Dynojet dynos... Apr 16 2005, 11:42 PM

redbird1 QUOTE (mitchntx @ Apr 16 2005, 17:42)Mustang ... Apr 17 2005, 01:53 AM

pimpmaro I tend to agree with you. HP = (Tq*RPM)/5252. We... Apr 17 2005, 12:16 PM

Jon A That makes me feel better. If you want numbers to... Apr 19 2005, 09:56 AM

bruecksteve Nice flat torque curve but a big drop in the upper... Apr 19 2005, 12:39 PM

bruecksteve I just got two books: How to Rebuild Small-Block C... Apr 19 2005, 12:47 PM

trax Aah yes, the Mustang Dyno. I figured your numbers... Apr 19 2005, 02:45 PM

pimpmaro QUOTE (Jon A @ Apr 19 2005, 03:56)That makes ... Apr 19 2005, 02:50 PM

Jon A Correct, there are some models with different drum... Apr 19 2005, 07:20 PM

redbird1 Concidering all the experience that you all have I... Apr 20 2005, 11:04 PM

fa63 As others have said, you might want to look into a... Apr 21 2005, 12:50 AM

Jon A QUOTE (Jon A @ Apr 19 2005, 11:20)Correct, th... Apr 21 2005, 09:19 AM

redbird1 http://www.airflowresearch.com/ I just looked at ... Apr 25 2005, 11:14 PM

redbird1 I emailed the head manufacture AFR yesterday. I de... Apr 27 2005, 10:56 PM

Formula WS6 at this point i see the hydrarev kit as a bandaid ... Apr 27 2005, 11:11 PM

redbird1 QUOTE (Formula WS6 @ Apr 27 2005, 17:11)at th... Apr 27 2005, 11:19 PM

Jon A Screw AFR. A rev kit certainly isn't a bad id... Apr 28 2005, 08:05 AM

94bird Steve, guess I missed this thread until now. If yo... May 8 2005, 02:27 AM

2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

redbird1 View Member Profile	Apr 13 2005, 12:13 AM Post #1
Advanced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 297 Joined: 14-February 04 Member No.: 203	I intended to post this Thursday night but I figured I would put out a little teaser. My car is going on the dyno Thursday for it's tune with the new setup. I'm geeked! I've been running a base tune that they put in last fall. Car feels very good/strong. Here's a few pics. (IMG:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v294/Redbird1/engine/e1dc9395.jpg) (IMG:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v294/Redbird1/engine/08a5ae20.jpg) (IMG:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v294/Redbird1/engine/b9d73198.jpg) GMHTP had a 383 with ported stock heads put down (uncorrected) 448.5 at the crank. I have AFR190 street port. Not sure if this is better or worse than the ported stocks. Find out Thursday. My hope when I started this was 400 HP at the wheels. Wish me luck. Steve