IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Unbalanced EngineeringBlaine Fabrication.comHotpart.comSolo PerformanceUMI Performance
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 3rd and 4th gen owners with shop manuals, Please step inside
35th_Anniversary...
post Jan 27 2006, 10:03 PM
Post #21


Chapter 11 Racing
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,166
Joined: 15-February 04
From: Houston, Republic of Texas
Member No.: 207



QUOTE (KeithO @ Jan 27 2006, 15:20)
RATS! I made them all line up nice and it stripped out the duplicate spaces...

use non-breaking spaces... &.nbsp; (without the . after the &)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KeithO
post Jan 31 2006, 12:45 PM
Post #22


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,647
Joined: 23-December 03
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Member No.: 14



Any new information available here?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slowcamaro
post Jan 31 2006, 05:07 PM
Post #23


Member
*

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 209
Joined: 6-August 05
From: Cumberland, Md
Member No.: 841



This is the only info I could find mentioniong the rear axle alignment at all...sourced from 1982 Shop manual

(IMG:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v296/splbassx/rearalignment1982shopmanual.jpg)

This post has been edited by slowcamaro: Jan 31 2006, 05:08 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John_D.
post Jan 31 2006, 08:46 PM
Post #24


Engine and Tools Moderator
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,859
Joined: 23-December 03
From: Lebanon TN
Member No.: 6



Wow, up to 5 degrees positive?

If I did my math right, the top of the tire would be 2.25 inches further out than the bottom of the tire... That's a lot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CMC#5
post Feb 1 2006, 12:30 AM
Post #25


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 902
Joined: 27-January 04
From: Magnolia, Tx.
Member No.: 160



Ok, so I think that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that alignment numbers on these manuals didnt get the QA/QC they deserved (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rotf.gif) 5 degrees...that's funny
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KeithO
post Feb 1 2006, 12:38 AM
Post #26


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,647
Joined: 23-December 03
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Member No.: 14



The plot thickens. I love a story with unexpected twists and turns. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeff94TA
post Feb 1 2006, 02:18 AM
Post #27


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 461
Joined: 24-December 03
From: Orlando, FL
Member No.: 34



Sorry for the delay.

1994 +/- 0.6° +/- 0.6°

This post has been edited by Jeff94TA: Feb 1 2006, 02:18 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JimMueller
post Feb 1 2006, 03:31 AM
Post #28


Experienced Member
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,695
Joined: 15-February 04
From: Casselberry FL
Member No.: 206



Hmm, I know this doesn't help for the rear, but the alignment guy that Jeff94TA and I use put this up for the front specs on his site, based upon what's in the Hunter database:

http://www.centralfloridastreetcars.com/al...gnmentspecs.htm

He said it doesn't have the settings for the rear because it's not designed to be adjustable :-)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KeithO
post Feb 1 2006, 04:52 AM
Post #29


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,647
Joined: 23-December 03
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Member No.: 14



QUOTE (Jeff94TA @ Jan 31 2006, 20:18)
Sorry for the delay.

1994 +/- 0.6° +/- 0.6°

My previous table has been updated. Thanks. We have all 4th gen years except for one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
axoid
post Feb 1 2006, 11:17 AM
Post #30


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Columbus, OH
Member No.: 70



I looked through my 92 service manual and couldn't find any alignment specs for anything but the front.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
z28jeff
post Feb 1 2006, 11:31 AM
Post #31


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 458
Joined: 11-October 05
From: Uniontown, Pa
Member No.: 917



QUOTE (KeithO @ Jan 31 2006, 22:52)
QUOTE (Jeff94TA @ Jan 31 2006, 20:18)
Sorry for the delay.

1994 +/- 0.6° +/- 0.6°

My previous table has been updated. Thanks. We have all 4th gen years except for one.

Allthough I like what you have down for 94, I believe Jeff94TA said it was +/- 0.6° +/- 0.6°. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Which would make 95 the changeover year to +/- 1.6*.

This post has been edited by z28jeff: Feb 1 2006, 11:32 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st June 2025 - 10:22 AM