![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
Chapter 11 Racing ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,166 Joined: 15-February 04 From: Houston, Republic of Texas Member No.: 207 ![]() |
QUOTE (KeithO @ Jan 27 2006, 15:20) RATS! I made them all line up nice and it stripped out the duplicate spaces... use non-breaking spaces... &.nbsp; (without the . after the &) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,647 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Pittsburgh, PA Member No.: 14 ![]() |
Any new information available here?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 209 Joined: 6-August 05 From: Cumberland, Md Member No.: 841 ![]() |
This is the only info I could find mentioniong the rear axle alignment at all...sourced from 1982 Shop manual
(IMG:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v296/splbassx/rearalignment1982shopmanual.jpg) This post has been edited by slowcamaro: Jan 31 2006, 05:08 PM |
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Engine and Tools Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,859 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Lebanon TN Member No.: 6 ![]() |
Wow, up to 5 degrees positive?
If I did my math right, the top of the tire would be 2.25 inches further out than the bottom of the tire... That's a lot. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 902 Joined: 27-January 04 From: Magnolia, Tx. Member No.: 160 ![]() |
Ok, so I think that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that alignment numbers on these manuals didnt get the QA/QC they deserved (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rotf.gif) 5 degrees...that's funny
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#26
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,647 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Pittsburgh, PA Member No.: 14 ![]() |
The plot thickens. I love a story with unexpected twists and turns. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#27
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 461 Joined: 24-December 03 From: Orlando, FL Member No.: 34 ![]() |
Sorry for the delay.
1994 +/- 0.6° +/- 0.6° This post has been edited by Jeff94TA: Feb 1 2006, 02:18 AM |
|
|
![]()
Post
#28
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,695 Joined: 15-February 04 From: Casselberry FL Member No.: 206 ![]() |
Hmm, I know this doesn't help for the rear, but the alignment guy that Jeff94TA and I use put this up for the front specs on his site, based upon what's in the Hunter database:
http://www.centralfloridastreetcars.com/al...gnmentspecs.htm He said it doesn't have the settings for the rear because it's not designed to be adjustable :-) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#29
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,647 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Pittsburgh, PA Member No.: 14 ![]() |
QUOTE (Jeff94TA @ Jan 31 2006, 20:18) Sorry for the delay. 1994 +/- 0.6° +/- 0.6° My previous table has been updated. Thanks. We have all 4th gen years except for one. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#30
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 604 Joined: 30-December 03 From: Columbus, OH Member No.: 70 ![]() |
I looked through my 92 service manual and couldn't find any alignment specs for anything but the front.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#31
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 458 Joined: 11-October 05 From: Uniontown, Pa Member No.: 917 ![]() |
QUOTE (KeithO @ Jan 31 2006, 22:52) QUOTE (Jeff94TA @ Jan 31 2006, 20:18) Sorry for the delay. 1994 +/- 0.6° +/- 0.6° My previous table has been updated. Thanks. We have all 4th gen years except for one. Allthough I like what you have down for 94, I believe Jeff94TA said it was +/- 0.6° +/- 0.6°. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Which would make 95 the changeover year to +/- 1.6*. This post has been edited by z28jeff: Feb 1 2006, 11:32 AM |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st June 2025 - 10:22 AM |