IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Unbalanced EngineeringUMI PerformanceHotpart.comSolo PerformanceBlaine Fabrication.com
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How do longer ball joints affect suspension geometry?
notsonic
post Jul 10 2011, 01:52 AM
Post #1


newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 31-July 08
Member No.: 2,266



So this is slightly off topic as its for my fiero, but i see some third gen owners have brought up the topic, dunno about fourth gens, and I know this is the place that could answer a suspension question or two with a real answer.

A somewhat popular product for fieros are this guy's extended ball joints for the front that lower it about an 1" (also has a 1/2" version.)

http://rodneydickman.com/catalog/product_i...products_id=158


I'm debating these or lowering springs. Its not a race car, more or less a daily driver.

I'm wondering if these are better, worse, or no different to the suspension geometry and handling characteristics vs 1" drop springs.

Its also got me wondering, if they are better, then am I doing wrong by using lowering springs in my fourth gen?

paranoia.

Any input would be appreciated.

This post has been edited by notsonic: Jul 10 2011, 01:53 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Al weyman
post Jul 10 2011, 08:08 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 31-May 11
From: Watford Hertfordshire UK
Member No.: 80,843



I must admit I wondered this when I commented on a post about the Howe Joints. I have them on my 2nd gen uppers and can see how that works as it effectively alters the angle of the upper wishbone doing basically what the Guilstrade mod did without the hassle and in my case legal but I am confused how this helps on a third or forth gen McPherson strut set up apart from lowering the car slightly. But it wouldnt even do that if you have like I do on the 3rd gen, a coil over conversion.

This post has been edited by Al weyman: Jul 10 2011, 08:11 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StanIROCZ
post Jul 10 2011, 02:23 PM
Post #3


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,323
Joined: 30-March 06
From: Detroit Suburbs
Member No.: 1,144



It lowers the car without changing the LCA angle.

If you lower with all spring your roll center gets very low and you loose camber gain and you run into travel limitations with the jounce bumper. Lowering with the ball joint is effectively like a drop spindle.

One negative is it will effect bump steer unless you lower the tie rod the same amount.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Al weyman
post Jul 12 2011, 07:28 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 31-May 11
From: Watford Hertfordshire UK
Member No.: 80,843



Makes sense thanks. Funny enough I was playing with the front suspension on my 3rd gen last night with a view to cutting down the Spohn supplied front springs as I have no adjustment on one side coil over as its already on the minimum setting which means cornerweighting is a compromise and I did notice even at this how close the lower A-arm comes to the chassis , I think the bump stops have been talen off on the car but its 20 years ago since I first built it and it is purely a race car on smooth tracks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 12:18 PM