IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Unbalanced EngineeringHotpart.comBlaine Fabrication.comSolo PerformanceUMI Performance
3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 3rd Gen vs. 4th Gen, Pros and Cons of each generation.
axoid
post Jun 22 2009, 07:10 PM
Post #41


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Columbus, OH
Member No.: 70



QUOTE (trackbird @ Jun 22 2009, 06:02 AM) *
I know Axoid has 17x11's on the rear of his 3rd gen...


I have 315s on the front now too. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
trackbird
post Jun 22 2009, 07:18 PM
Post #42


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



QUOTE (axoid @ Jun 22 2009, 03:10 PM) *
QUOTE (trackbird @ Jun 22 2009, 06:02 AM) *
I know Axoid has 17x11's on the rear of his 3rd gen...


I have 315s on the front now too. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


But not on 17x11's...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BigEnos
post Jun 22 2009, 07:24 PM
Post #43


Collo Rosso
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,220
Joined: 3-August 05
From: San Antonio, TX
Member No.: 839



For autocross in ESP, an LT1 4th gen is my fav. Fewer ABS issues, the clutch usually works OK, more gearing options, and way better steering feel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StanIROCZ
post Jun 22 2009, 07:57 PM
Post #44


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,323
Joined: 30-March 06
From: Detroit Suburbs
Member No.: 1,144



The EXACT same question was asked here:

http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=10869

Don't feel bad for not searching since this was hard for me to find when I knew it was out there somewhere.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mojave
post Jun 22 2009, 09:13 PM
Post #45


I suck at the auto-x :(
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,421
Joined: 21-April 05
From: TX
Member No.: 727



QUOTE (StanIROCZ @ Jun 22 2009, 02:57 PM) *
The EXACT same question was asked here:

http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=10869

Don't feel bad for not searching since this was hard for me to find when I knew it was out there somewhere.


Damn, I spent 20 mins looking for that thread but gave up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
trackbird
post Jun 22 2009, 09:16 PM
Post #46


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



I was thinking about that other thread, but I was lazy...

Thanks Stan!

Merged.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
souseless
post Jun 23 2009, 12:02 AM
Post #47


Member
*

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 244
Joined: 27-January 04
Member No.: 158



I have 315's on 17x11's all the way around my 89 TA. Now the do stick out beyond the wheel well but I have adequate turn radius for autox. I by the way like the 3rd gen for reasons already posted especialy overall looks and that masive 4th gen dash. I also agree that the combo to have is an LSX 3rd gen. I would stick with the lighter t5 though. They seem to hold up fine when not drag racing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
trackbird
post Jun 23 2009, 09:54 PM
Post #48


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



I don't think you could make a T5 live behind an LSx (even if you could bolt it up) while driving it as you'd drive an LSx'd third gen. "Poof", nothing but transmission dust...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
1meanZ
post Jun 23 2009, 09:58 PM
Post #49


Mullet club chairman
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 786
Joined: 25-March 06
From: South Bend IN
Member No.: 1,135



QUOTE (firehawkclone @ Dec 6 2007, 08:32 PM) *
One more thing......PCM's

4th gen is much easier to reprogram.


You sure about that? I dropped $300 at Moates.net and I can now tune and datalog any OBDI GM car there is.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
trackbird
post Jun 23 2009, 10:01 PM
Post #50


FRRAX Owner/Admin
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,432
Joined: 13-February 04
From: Ohio
Member No.: 196



QUOTE (1meanZ @ Jun 23 2009, 05:58 PM) *
QUOTE (firehawkclone @ Dec 6 2007, 08:32 PM) *
One more thing......PCM's

4th gen is much easier to reprogram.


You sure about that? I dropped $300 at Moates.net and I can now tune and datalog any OBDI GM car there is.....


I have the osterich and all that good stuff, and I haven't bothered to learn to tune the 3rd gens. My solution is likely to involve Motec or similar (or a carb...bwhahahahahahahahaha). I do hate the ECM's in these cars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CMC #37
post Jun 23 2009, 10:25 PM
Post #51


CMCer
*****

Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,932
Joined: 12-February 04
From: the sticks near VIR
Member No.: 194



QUOTE (trackbird @ Jun 23 2009, 04:54 PM) *
I don't think you could make a T5 live behind an LSx (even if you could bolt it up) while driving it as you'd drive an LSx'd third gen. "Poof", nothing but transmission dust...


Word! The T5 could not live more than a few race weekends with my knarly 305 powered CMC car!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
1meanZ
post Jun 23 2009, 10:32 PM
Post #52


Mullet club chairman
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 786
Joined: 25-March 06
From: South Bend IN
Member No.: 1,135



QUOTE (trackbird @ Jun 23 2009, 06:01 PM) *
I do hate the ECM's in these cars.


Of course you do, the Ostrich is NOT the best setup. If you had this, you wouldn't mind it at all. I enjoy tuning.
http://www.moates.net/product_info.php?cPa...;products_id=54
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
axoid
post Jun 23 2009, 10:39 PM
Post #53


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Columbus, OH
Member No.: 70



My T5 has survived for a year behind a Firehawk motor, which is as strong or stronger then a stock LS1.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nape
post Jun 24 2009, 12:43 AM
Post #54


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,511
Joined: 14-November 04
From: Homer Glen, IL
Member No.: 540



QUOTE (1meanZ @ Jun 23 2009, 05:32 PM) *
QUOTE (trackbird @ Jun 23 2009, 06:01 PM) *
I do hate the ECM's in these cars.


Of course you do, the Ostrich is NOT the best setup. If you had this, you wouldn't mind it at all. I enjoy tuning.
http://www.moates.net/product_info.php?cPa...;products_id=54


I had that setup and I still hated the EFI. TPI sucks and everything else is a band aid. I put a $65 Performer RPM intake and a $300 Holley 600DP and made 50RWHP more and now I don't have to worry about 20-25yr old modules and wiring either.

QUOTE (axoid @ Jun 23 2009, 05:39 PM) *
My T5 has survived for a year behind a Firehawk motor, which is as strong or stronger then a stock LS1.


Are you doing many track days? I'm not trying to get into a "road race vs. auto-x" dick swinging contest, but a weekend on the track is probably a year or more of autocross duty. That's not even mentioning the extra heat in running it that hard for that long.

If AI could run dog-ring gearboxes, I'd probably have a dog ring T5. Dog rings would get rid of a lot of synchro issues and the straight cut gears get rid of the gear weakness, then you're only dealing with heat and case flex.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StanIROCZ
post Jun 24 2009, 12:52 AM
Post #55


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,323
Joined: 30-March 06
From: Detroit Suburbs
Member No.: 1,144



QUOTE (nape @ Jun 23 2009, 08:43 PM) *
I had that setup and I still hated the EFI. TPI sucks and everything else is a band aid. I put a $65 Performer RPM intake and a $300 Holley 600DP and made 50RWHP more and now I don't have to worry about 20-25yr old modules and wiring either.

Part of your problem was you had a bad Autoprom. It was the early version that had some issues. After I bought it from you I traded it for a new one from Craig.

But I agree, it still takes a lot of effort and patience to tune. I had many 'issues' before I could even get to the point of doing some meaningful tuning. Some of that I brought upon myself by being the only person in the world with a Jerico and a TPI, but there was some other stuff that was out of my control. DIY prom on thirdgen.org is your friend.

It is fun when you make a change and it 'works' (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

This post has been edited by StanIROCZ: Jun 24 2009, 12:53 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slowTA
post Jun 24 2009, 01:38 AM
Post #56


Experienced Member
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,289
Joined: 4-May 04
From: Kenvil, NJ
Member No.: 331



How do you tell the difference between the new and old Autoproms? I always have issues with mine, something goes haywire and I have to unplug the ECU to reset it. There was also an instance where the engine would stall briefly, but 'restart' just by momentum of the car.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
axoid
post Jun 24 2009, 01:55 AM
Post #57


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Columbus, OH
Member No.: 70



QUOTE (nape @ Jun 23 2009, 06:43 PM) *
Are you doing many track days? I'm not trying to get into a "road race vs. auto-x" dick swinging contest, but a weekend on the track is probably a year or more of autocross duty. That's not even mentioning the extra heat in running it that hard for that long.

My T5 hasn't seen any track time since the 350 got installed last year (persistent oil leak on the engine), but it has seen track time behind the pervious 305. I can see that all the shifting would be a different type of stress on a transmission than what autocross causes, but most of tracking and road racing doesn't launch from a dead stop as autocross does, even if it isn't as hard as a drag race start. I've always believed that it is hard shocks that break transmissions. I wouldn't think that there would be anything preventing putting an oil cooler on the T5.

Ether way, my trans has 105+ K miles on it, 25+K under my ownership.

I'm sure some day it will blow, I'll just fix it and throw it back in again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
1meanZ
post Jun 24 2009, 02:05 AM
Post #58


Mullet club chairman
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 786
Joined: 25-March 06
From: South Bend IN
Member No.: 1,135



I must have one of the later ones because the only issue I've had is getting it to simultaneously emulate and datalog. Otherwise I've not had any issues. Tuning takes time, and you have to understand what you're doing. If you are impatient and in a rush, your tune will reflect that. Anything worthwhile takes time, tuning is no different. For those of us that dual purpose our cars, EFI is very much worth it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
firehawkclone
post Jun 24 2009, 02:08 AM
Post #59


Grumpy
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,722
Joined: 1-January 04
From: Bakersfield CA
Member No.: 81



Every chassis has its problems that you can go around/fix! Some are easier nowdays than in the past, and some take longer to do... but thats ok to some. It also depends on what chassis you started this little adventure where all on here!

I still think a LS 5.3 powered 3rd gen AI car would be hard to beat! To some it may not! Atleast its all GM!

.02
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th June 2025 - 08:51 PM