IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
UMI PerformanceHotpart.comUnbalanced EngineeringBlaine Fabrication.comSolo Performance
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The old discussion:, F-body vs Mustang
ESPCamaro
post Nov 1 2004, 11:35 PM
Post #21


No El-Use-O.
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,368
Joined: 27-December 03
From: SW Michigan
Member No.: 52



Also for those who are looking note that Marcus would have been 3rd in ESP if not for cones.

The advantages of each make for pretty much equal cars. That's one of the reasons these AWD cars being in our class is such bullshit.

BTW Sam was Marcus on Hoosiers still at Nationals? If so he's gonna give folks a rough time next year.

I havn't read the entire thread yet but in some cases, if not most, the Mustangs have more torque. If not in engine ratings, but in torque multiplied by trans ratios, and rear end ratios.

I've heard Marcus's car has 200lbs or more of torque AT IDLE! S/P built 351 Cobra R engine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th May 2025 - 10:06 AM