![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 382 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Kathmandu, Nepal Member No.: 2 ![]() |
Since this reply gets slightly off topic, I decided to post it in general discussion. It is in response to Snorkelface’s question in this brake thread:
http://frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?act=ST&...=15entry32147 QUOTE: “OK, I have to ask what makes a "Floating Rotor" design just that?” Answer: Depending on the final target weight of the rotor, they disperse about 9 to 12 oz of anti-gravity granules into the mold before pouring in the molten iron. It does wonders for unsprung weight, and greatly reduces shipping costs. This reminds me of my childhood in Nepal. My dad was a truck driver, and one of his regular jobs was delivering birds to a pet store supplier. When we were pulling on the scales to be weighed for road tax, he would have me get out and bang on the side of the trailer to get the birds to flap their wings and hover in their cages. We both thought that this would make our load weigh less. When I was older, I realized that this did not affect the weight at all. But now that I am really old, I understand that it would have some effect on the weight. Maybe some of our resident physicists would care to “weigh” in on this, since I have explained why floating rotors float. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th May 2025 - 09:58 PM |