![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 919 Joined: 30-December 03 From: Northern NY Member No.: 66 ![]() |
I hope everyone get a kick out of this. This is from my other form of racing that I came from. Any guess on what type of vehicle. Anybody that knows what I did will know. But for any that don't take a guess!!! It runs NHRA/IHRA it is not a car or bike. 8,000 dollars to get this performance and it can run a STOCK class of racing . John
0-60ft 1.68 sec 660ft et 6.66 sec 660ft mph 98.23 1320ft 10.52et at 122.5 mph 0-30 mph .74sec 0-30 mph 21.41 ft 0-60 mph 2.27sec 0-60 mph 126.36ft 30-50 mph .93sec 30-50 mph 55.91ft 50-70 mph 1.33 sec peak 1.8G at finish .5G |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,697 Joined: 15-February 04 From: Casselberry FL Member No.: 206 ![]() |
Hmm... NY...I'll guess snowmobile.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 715 Joined: 29-May 04 From: Cincinnati, Ohio Member No.: 352 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 919 Joined: 30-December 03 From: Northern NY Member No.: 66 ![]() |
I still didnt think that NASRA info was still out in Cyber world. Yes its a snowmibile. Fun thing is that it is stock.
I've have been 9.17 at 140 back in 97 but i don't have any fun info like above. Current technolgy and NOS have pushed the et's down to 8.20's at 165mph. Later John |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 919 Joined: 30-December 03 From: Northern NY Member No.: 66 ![]() |
Found a couple more tid bits of info
Vehicle weight 825 with rider 158 hp crank 76 Rwhp. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rotf.gif) Yes the CVT tranny suck alot of power. My setup is more efficent than most. later John |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th July 2025 - 09:25 PM |