IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Hotpart.comUMI PerformanceUnbalanced EngineeringBlaine Fabrication.comSolo Performance
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Interesting Race Vehicle, Performance Figures!!!
Ojustracing
post Feb 26 2005, 03:59 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 919
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Northern NY
Member No.: 66



I hope everyone get a kick out of this. This is from my other form of racing that I came from. Any guess on what type of vehicle. Anybody that knows what I did will know. But for any that don't take a guess!!! It runs NHRA/IHRA it is not a car or bike. 8,000 dollars to get this performance and it can run a STOCK class of racing . John

0-60ft 1.68 sec
660ft et 6.66 sec
660ft mph 98.23
1320ft 10.52et at 122.5 mph

0-30 mph .74sec
0-30 mph 21.41 ft
0-60 mph 2.27sec
0-60 mph 126.36ft
30-50 mph .93sec
30-50 mph 55.91ft
50-70 mph 1.33 sec
peak 1.8G
at finish .5G
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JimMueller
post Feb 26 2005, 06:11 AM
Post #2


Experienced Member
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,697
Joined: 15-February 04
From: Casselberry FL
Member No.: 206



Hmm... NY...I'll guess snowmobile.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shortbus
post Feb 26 2005, 06:16 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 715
Joined: 29-May 04
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Member No.: 352



I cheated with google.

http://www.off-road.com/snowmobile/nasra/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ojustracing
post Feb 26 2005, 03:20 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 919
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Northern NY
Member No.: 66



I still didnt think that NASRA info was still out in Cyber world. Yes its a snowmibile. Fun thing is that it is stock.
I've have been 9.17 at 140 back in 97 but i don't have any fun info like above. Current technolgy and NOS have pushed the et's down to 8.20's at 165mph. Later John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ojustracing
post Feb 27 2005, 02:06 AM
Post #5


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 919
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Northern NY
Member No.: 66



Found a couple more tid bits of info

Vehicle weight 825 with rider
158 hp crank
76 Rwhp. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/rotf.gif)

Yes the CVT tranny suck alot of power. My setup is more efficent than most. later John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th July 2025 - 09:25 PM