From the conversation we had about it, it is. He was running no rear sway bar.
Teutonic Speedracer
Feb 14 2005, 05:17 PM
QUOTE (trackbird @ Feb 13 2005, 11:45 PM)
He was running no rear sway bar.
So, he had the 35mm/0mm combo!
trackbird
Feb 14 2005, 05:52 PM
QUOTE (Teutonic Speedracer @ Feb 14 2005, 12:17 PM)
QUOTE (trackbird @ Feb 13 2005, 11:45 PM)
He was running no rear sway bar.
So, he had the 35mm/0mm combo!
That would appear to be so.
Crazy Canuck
Feb 15 2005, 02:56 AM
that would make a great avatar for Mitchntx...
bowtieboy
Feb 15 2005, 03:08 AM
Looks like he was running 315's as well. ......which would help explain that grip he seems to be attaining.
jraskell
Feb 15 2005, 03:34 PM
I remember seeing the video that frame was extracted from a while ago. I thought it was posted on these forums even. (the reason that pic is so jagged is because it's just a frame extracted from an interlaced mpeg video).
Just out of curiosity, why would anyone run without a rear swaybar?
00 SS
Feb 15 2005, 04:22 PM
I bet it's real. I have a pic of my wifes Fstock TA with the left front wheel in the air from last years nationals. It's not quite that high up though.
I have no idea why anyone would want less than the stock rear bar, maybe he has VERY stiff rear springs?
mitchntx
Feb 15 2005, 05:35 PM
QUOTE (jraskell @ Feb 15 2005, 09:34 AM)
Just out of curiosity, why would anyone run without a rear swaybar?
To get a nifty pic to post on the internet
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.