![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 123 Joined: 25-December 03 From: KS Member No.: 38 ![]() |
I thought this was an intriguing quote from the following link. See below.
http://www.maximum-cars.com/Cars/Car.php?carnumber=624 [Working on a clean sheet of paper, Mustang’s engineering team could have selected any type of setup at the rear, including an independent suspension. So why choose a solid rear axle? The answer lies in Mustang’s position as America’s muscle car. "We talked to a lot of Mustang owners and racers when we were developing this program," says Thai-Tang. "They are a very passionate group, and a lot of them told us – very strongly – that the all-new Mustang must have a solid rear axle because of its combination of performance and modification flexibility." ] Who would have thought a solid rear would be chosen over an IRS. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 440 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Nashville, TN Member No.: 1 ![]() |
Its an excuse.....
They are saying it is because of the drag racers, but it was really a cost issue. Can't blame them though. What good is a new mustang if its priced too high for their core market? But to say that the drag racing community, which might make up, realistically, 5% of all mustang sales, convinced them, is silly. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th August 2025 - 11:49 PM |