![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 119 Joined: 22-April 06 From: Beloit, Wisconsin Member No.: 1,167 ![]() |
This should be fun.
Your opinions on the pros and cons between the 3rd and 4th gen F-bodies. These are my opinions, and I could be way off with a couple of items. Engines: 4th gen wins this one. Racing groups keep forgetting that the LT1 350's were a option in the later 3rd gen years, but keep forcing the 305s of being the only option for racing. The 4th gens have the 350s as the only V-8 option. Transmissions: 5-speeds; Tremec and the World class T-5's help make it a 3rd gen pro. Dependable enough, weighs less, and since when do you need 6 speeds for road racing. The only time I have actually shifted into fifth is at Road America running a 3.73 gear ratio. 6-speeds; weigh more, more dependable than regular BW 5 spd. Front Suspension: 4th gen hands down. Rear Suspension: Tie, they are the same for both generations. I do use the 4th gen Koni Yellow rear on my 83 Z-28 because I do not have to remove the rear shock to adjust it. Overall Weight: In stock trim I know for sure the 3rd gen has the advantage. I have not seen actual weights for stripped down 4th gens so it may be close. Brakes: Out of the box I would give the 4th gens the advantage. Parts Availability: 4th gen. They are everywhere. Aftermarket parts were really not available for the 3rd gens compared to 1st and 2nd gen cars. It just seems the Aftermarket Companies really never worked hard for the 3rd gens. The 3rd gens are still competing in large numbers and you have to look hard for performance parts. If I had the money...... Ease of maintenance: I give the pro to the 3rd gens. The 4th gen engine compartment is a pain, and the dash is as big as a pain. Overall Looks: The 3rd gen looks sleek and fast. The 4th gen looks like a beast and would grab the competiition and beat or eat it. My favorite 4th gen commercial was the Pontiac Ram Air Trans-Am. Pulls up behind a Ferrari, revs and swallows the Ferrari and sends it out through its tail pipes. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/lmao.gif) I love the looks of the 2000- 2002 RA TA's. They are just plain mean lookin'. Interior: Pro to 4th gen. The interior just seemed more refined compared to the 3rd gen. Your turn. This post has been edited by T.O.Dillinder: Dec 6 2007, 05:40 PM |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,038 Joined: 29-December 03 From: Texas, USA Member No.: 62 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 119 Joined: 22-April 06 From: Beloit, Wisconsin Member No.: 1,167 ![]() |
Front Suspension: 4th gen hands down. Say what? Wins how? What are the parameters for claiming victory? I just feel the upper and lower control arm design is better than a MacPherson Strut front end. Easier to make suspension adjustments. Plus being The later model years, the 4th Gen has a load of aftermarket parts. I have wondered at times if the MacPherson Strut design and also the beginning of the electronic fuel injection systems kept Aftermarket Manufacturers at a distance from the 3rd Gens when they were new. The original post is intended to get your personal opinions about the two generations. I am not trying to start any sort of arguement. It is more about finding nuances between the two. I have test drove the 4th gens, but I have not had the oppurtunity to work extensively on one. I know from watching a couple of aquaintcences with theirs', the Windshield coming over the engine compartment makes working on one a pain when working in that area. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 119 Joined: 22-April 06 From: Beloit, Wisconsin Member No.: 1,167 ![]() |
QUOTE The original post is intended to get your personal opinions about the two generations. I am not trying to start any sort of arguement. It is more about finding nuances between the two. I have test drove the 4th gens, but I have not had the oppurtunity to work extensively on one. I know from watching a couple of aquaintcences with theirs', the Windshield coming over the engine compartment makes working on one a pain when working in that area. My 83 has Camber Plates. I worked with SLA's on three GT-1 cars, two super late models (short track) and a couple of older Monte Carlos in Street Stock for short track racing. With a SLA you can adjust Camber, Toe, and Caster. Caster can effect how the car reacts during braking. With my limited experience with strut set ups, you have Camber and Toe adjustments, correct? My 83 Camaro is set up at - 2.0 Camber and 1/16" toe out. A friend of mine that has raced 3rd gens in MWC and NASA for six years now suggested that I can go 1/8" toe out for a tighter turn road coarse. Yes losening 2 bolts is quicker than four. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th June 2025 - 12:06 PM |