IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Unbalanced EngineeringBlaine Fabrication.comUMI PerformanceHotpart.comSolo Performance
> Global warming stickers required for CA cars...., CA gets "Gore'd", NY next...
Rob Hood
post Jan 3 2009, 11:18 PM
Post #1


Experienced Member
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 16-January 04
From: Chandler AZ
Member No.: 130



http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=128569

Article is posted in case the link is bad -

SACRAMENTO, California — The state of California will require all 2009 model and later cars to be labeled with stickers giving their global warming score, starting at the beginning of the year. The labels will rate vehicles on a scale of 1-10 — with 10 being the best and 5 an average number — based on direct emissions and emissions related to fuel production, and will let consumers make comparisons between models.

California vehicles already are given a Smog Score, in which new models are rated on a 1-10 scale for emissions. The labeling will be displayed side by side on new vehicles sold in the state. Consumers can also look up detailed information on the Drive Clean Web site.

New York can expect a similar sticker law for new models starting in 2010.

What this means to you: Environmental-impact stickers: not just for refrigerators anymore.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
CrashTestDummy
post Jan 6 2009, 04:50 PM
Post #2


Veteran Member
*****

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,884
Joined: 3-July 04
From: Pearland, Texas
Member No.: 385



Interesting that electric cars are almost unanimously-rated a 10. It's funny how people conveniently forget that electric cars still pollute, it's just that the point source of the pollution is not in their garage, although it is usually from coal-fired generation plants.

I call this one 'Busted'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
v7guy
post Jan 6 2009, 05:29 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 854
Joined: 26-December 03
From: NYC, NY
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (CrashTestDummy @ Jan 6 2009, 11:50 AM) *
Interesting that electric cars are almost unanimously-rated a 10. It's funny how people conveniently forget that electric cars still pollute, it's just that the point source of the pollution is not in their garage, although it is usually from coal-fired generation plants.

I call this one 'Busted'.



It's pat of the reason I doubt the global warming scare (or global cooling scare if you look back 40yrs). Out of curiosity how does my trailblazer have a larger carbon footprint but a better score than my old S10 blazer?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Rob Hood   Global warming stickers required for CA cars....   Jan 3 2009, 11:18 PM
trackbird   We should fly to California and build a giant bon ...   Jan 4 2009, 06:11 AM
MarkT   'Tis a good idea...but liberalism has spread l...   Jan 4 2009, 07:25 AM
Blainefab   QUOTE (Rob Hood @ Jan 3 2009, 03:18 PM) h...   Jan 4 2009, 09:21 AM
ledfoot2   I want one for my car with the "1" ratin...   Jan 4 2009, 06:04 PM
StanIROCZ   1 means "good" right   Jan 4 2009, 06:19 PM
ledfoot2   QUOTE (StanIROCZ @ Jan 4 2009, 12:19 PM) ...   Jan 4 2009, 08:33 PM
Pilot   Cats reduce efficiency, don't they?   Jan 4 2009, 08:42 PM
pknowles   Every vehicle I own, even the 98 Honda Civic has a...   Jan 4 2009, 09:09 PM
billy_ocean   I win! so far, haha. the DD (company car) go...   Jan 5 2009, 09:56 AM
pknowles   QUOTE (billy_ocean @ Jan 5 2009, 04:56 AM...   Jan 5 2009, 01:02 PM
DRD T-bone   More information isn't necessarily a bad thing...   Jan 5 2009, 02:45 PM
mitchntx   My tow vehicle ... not listed. 2006 MAzda CX7 C...   Jan 5 2009, 04:03 PM
00 Trans Ram   Well, I think they're idiots. Trying to look u...   Jan 5 2009, 04:21 PM
pknowles   The reason why I hate "ratings" like thi...   Jan 5 2009, 06:10 PM
CrashTestDummy   Interesting that electric cars are almost unanimou...   Jan 6 2009, 04:50 PM
v7guy   QUOTE (CrashTestDummy @ Jan 6 2009, 11:50...   Jan 6 2009, 05:29 PM
DRD T-bone   QUOTE (v7guy @ Jan 6 2009, 10:29 AM) QUOT...   Jan 7 2009, 02:46 PM
DanKeen   QUOTE (CrashTestDummy @ Jan 6 2009, 08:50...   Jan 7 2009, 10:05 PM
robz71lm7   Fuel economy numbers are what it should be based u...   Jan 8 2009, 02:04 AM
Major_Lee_Slow   WTF, my wife's 2003 Passat and my GMC Yukon bo...   Jan 8 2009, 10:32 PM
DRD T-bone   QUOTE (Major_Lee_Slow @ Jan 8 2009, 03:32...   Jan 9 2009, 03:36 PM
robz71lm7   QUOTE (DRD T-bone @ Jan 9 2009, 10:3...   Jan 9 2009, 10:42 PM
trackbird   QUOTE (Major_Lee_Slow @ Jan 8 2009, 05:32...   Jan 9 2009, 04:04 PM
00 Trans Ram   That's a basic problem with government taxing ...   Jan 8 2009, 11:55 PM
pknowles   QUOTE (00 Trans Ram @ Jan 8 2009, 06:55 P...   Jan 9 2009, 01:55 AM
robz71lm7   It's NOx that's the real problem-especiall...   Jan 9 2009, 03:00 AM
00 Trans Ram   Environmentalists have to be some of the most self...   Jan 9 2009, 05:34 PM
DRD T-bone   QUOTE (00 Trans Ram @ Jan 9 2009, 10:34 A...   Jan 9 2009, 06:59 PM
00 Trans Ram   But, humans are not separate from nature. We are a...   Jan 9 2009, 08:31 PM
DRD T-bone   QUOTE (00 Trans Ram @ Jan 9 2009, 01:31 P...   Jan 9 2009, 10:53 PM
rpoz-29   What human "luxuries" are you referring ...   Jan 9 2009, 10:10 PM
DRD T-bone   QUOTE (rpoz-29 @ Jan 9 2009, 03:10 P...   Jan 9 2009, 10:42 PM

« Next Oldest · General Discussion · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st May 2025 - 04:10 PM