![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Nothing says 'I love you.' like a box of Hydroshoks ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 5,284 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Granbury, TX Member No.: 4 ![]() |
Looking through Craiglist ads, I'm seeing C4s all over the spectrum.
Are 95 and 96 versions "special"? What's the difference between a 96 and 96 Limited edition? Could an LT4 be had in either? Is there a code in the VIN or something that tells me its a real LT4? Were there ANY that came with something other than porno red interior? What year did the C4s begin getting an LT1? 92? I am seeing 96 LEs @60K mile LT4/6spd cars in the low teens. I am seeing 94 and under @100K mile LT1/Autos cars in the 6s and 7s I am also seeing 98-00 FRCs in the low teens all in the 80-100K mile range with 6 speeds in the low to mid teens. But I really like the way a C4 looks. Seems like everyone has a C5. Not looking at a show car, just a driver. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
I build race cars ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 4,748 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Central coast, CA Member No.: 874 ![]() |
But I really like the way a C4 looks. Seems like everyone has a C5. Not looking at a show car, just a driver. Agreed, the late C4 is the best body design that came from GM - but the interior sucks. Narrow seats, cramped headroom, high sills would be tough on a big guy. The good news is they are cheap, and easy to make into a decent race car. Good weight dist, easy to get down to a reasonable weight, plenty of room for fat tires. My favorite C4's: (IMG:http://www.californiaclassix.com/images3/c432-leftside-remote.jpg) (IMG:http://para.noid.org/~c4racer/C4RACER/Oct-04/images/DSCN1663.JPG) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th May 2025 - 10:50 PM |