![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,289 Joined: 4-May 04 From: Kenvil, NJ Member No.: 331 ![]() |
So here is my post from 2014, where I shared pictures of my cross member idea.
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?sho...40&start=40 See post #70. And here are pictures from the DSE Facebook post from 2016. https://photos.app.goo.gl/56FMzxn7UwXz3UzX2 I'm thinking the main part that separates these 2 cross members from all the ohers is that they both relocated the mounting location back a few inches instead of making a huge lever off of the factory location. I know I've seen a few T56 cross members that have double humps for the exhaust so that isn't anything new and they made a more elegant arc, (which they better, mine is ugly) so I'm not going to complain there. But if that is a C channel they used it will collect a bunch of debris! If they did copy me I'll just take it as a compliment! |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,289 Joined: 4-May 04 From: Kenvil, NJ Member No.: 331 ![]() |
Ha, I'm not bitter. I just found it ironic that I just threw together something in my garage and someone that makes such expensive parts had the same idea (of moving the mounting point of the cross member back to the end of the subframe).
Although, I might think twice about posting pictures of whatever crazy things I make next time. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th June 2025 - 06:37 PM |