IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Solo PerformanceUnbalanced EngineeringUMI PerformanceBlaine Fabrication.comHotpart.com
> The old discussion:, F-body vs Mustang
Ackattack
post Oct 31 2004, 05:06 AM
Post #1


newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 30-April 04
From: Port Orchard WA
Member No.: 329



I was talking to a guy at work the other day, and the topic of cars came up, and he recently got an '04 Mustang GT. So during our discussion he was dogging on the F-body, and he admitted that I'd spank him in a drag race, but he bought the car for the handling not for drag racing.

So my question is do the GTs really handle any better than an F-body? I was under the impression that they both handled fairly equally, both are addequate and both can be improved on. I don't hear much talk about the rustangs handling, so I don't know much about them.

What is your feeling, knowledge, and/or experience with them handling wise in comparison to an F-body?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Soma07
post Nov 1 2004, 01:59 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
**

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 410
Joined: 24-December 03
From: Kissimmee/Orlando, FL
Member No.: 25



QUOTE (trax @ Oct 31 2004, 11:31 PM)
But instead, sites like corner-carvers give me the impression that Mustangs are still raced FAR more than F-bodies.

Although cc.com may not be a dedicated Mustang site I'd guesstimate ~75% of the posters there own a Mustang or have in the past. Mostly because the founders who started cc.com did so to get away from the worthless dribble that passes for tech at most Mustang sites. Hence alot of the discussions tend to be Mustang oriented.

That said I'm sure alot more Mustangs are autoxed/road raced than F-bodies. Why? Because Ford sold a shitload of them and most of the suspension components are interchangeable 79-04 (99+ Cobra excluded).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Ackattack   The old discussion:   Oct 31 2004, 05:06 AM
SSTAT   Its interesting he should say that. There are a lo...   Oct 31 2004, 03:19 PM
steve-d   Weight , weight and weght. How much less does th...   Oct 31 2004, 05:06 PM
CMC #37   LOL! I have never heard of anyone buying a Mus...   Oct 31 2004, 08:08 PM
Soma07   Let me put it this way, handling wise a Mustang: ...   Oct 31 2004, 08:45 PM
PF Flyer   ... the '05 is a biiggg improvement. They...   Oct 31 2004, 08:59 PM
slowTA   All I can say is that the Mustang guys switch over...   Oct 31 2004, 10:18 PM
CMC #37   QUOTE Let me put it this way, handling wise a Must...   Oct 31 2004, 10:51 PM
Dave B   The rear suspension on the "NEW and IMPROVED...   Nov 1 2004, 12:55 AM
slowTA   The '05 Mustang has a 3 link with a panhard ba...   Nov 1 2004, 12:59 AM
CMC#5   All you have to do to answer this question is look...   Nov 1 2004, 02:42 AM
trax   Obvious question... Even though it's been 10 ...   Nov 1 2004, 05:31 AM
1LEThumper   Pluses for the Mustang: cheaper car more cars out ...   Nov 1 2004, 07:24 AM
Spooner   I made the jump after owning three mustangs, but o...   Nov 1 2004, 12:58 PM
Soma07   QUOTE (trax @ Oct 31 2004, 11:31 PM)But inste...   Nov 1 2004, 01:59 PM
sgarnett   As I've said before, the Mustang won because w...   Nov 1 2004, 02:36 PM
LT4Firehawk   I've never driven a Mustang, but here's a ...   Nov 1 2004, 03:10 PM
AllZWay   Most of the fast Mustangs that I have encountered ...   Nov 1 2004, 03:52 PM
1LEThumper   QUOTE (LT4Firehawk @ Nov 1 2004, 09:10 AM)2)...   Nov 1 2004, 03:55 PM
Sam Strano   Regarding the new Mustang's suspension. It no...   Nov 1 2004, 11:16 PM
ESPCamaro   Also for those who are looking note that Marcus wo...   Nov 1 2004, 11:35 PM

« Next Oldest · General Discussion · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th May 2025 - 12:19 PM