|
||||
Nov 19 2004, 02:46 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 951 Joined: 2-January 04 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 88 |
hmmm, maybe it was a bad idea to build racer out of a higher mileage, abused f-body. I'm moving towards the point where its time to put it all back together . So what do I do? I diassemble the opti to verify its in good, usable condition
here's what I see http://www.vilipend.com/~frrax/clutch-and-opti it was actually even worse than you see there. I cleaned it up some. Well, I was kinda frustrated when I got to that point so I ended up bending the optical disc. Looks like I'll need a new one regardless. Thats an extra $400. Opti and WP, who wouldn't replace the opt w/o a new water pump? This thing coated w/ oil and grime, go back in the album and look at the engine, including the opti. Man, there are so many other things in this build up that are nickel and diming me to death. Lets just say I have a bad propensity to replace anything I touch that looks in the least bit questionable. should have just bought a low mileage ride and thrown a suspension and cage on it! it would have been cheaper in the long run. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Nov 20 2004, 02:13 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,647 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Pittsburgh, PA Member No.: 14 |
The following statements are based on my experiences and cannot be backed-up with any scientific data or statistics:
I want a GM crate motor built to GM specs (balancing and tolerances) because I *know* that a well-maintained factory motor can run strong well past 100,000 with good maintenance and nothing more. In contrast, I have seen quite a few people take quite a few approaches to rebuilding motors - do it themselves, do part of it themselves, do it with their buddies, farm out part of the work and farm out all of the work. These motors seem to have a much higher failure rate than motors built by the factory. I don't know why, but I have a few theories... Primarily related to the ability to repeatably build and assemble to tolerance and the host of equipment availble to check tolerance and balance of various pieces... In addition, I would rather spend $5000 ($4,800 actually) and know that is what I am going to spend then to start a project and just get in deeper. With a crate motor, I know what I am up against and I have a higher degree of confidence in the final product. |
|
|
|
y5e06 Escalating Rebuild Costs Nov 19 2004, 02:46 AM
bowtieboy I can relate to you.....
I just got done with my ... Nov 19 2004, 03:06 AM
94bird Well, the cheapest way is to buy a ready to race c... Nov 19 2004, 03:33 AM
y5e06 yeah, I absolutely knew it would be cheaper to bu... Nov 19 2004, 05:37 AM
#07 QUOTE (y5e06 @ Nov 18 2004, 10:37 PM)yeah, I... Nov 19 2004, 02:00 PM
KeithO This more or less reinforces my decision on my own... Nov 19 2004, 03:51 PM
rmackintosh QUOTE (KeithO @ Nov 19 2004, 09:51 AM)This mo... Nov 19 2004, 05:07 PM
CMC #37 Guess you guys will be interested when the #37 CMC... Nov 19 2004, 05:45 PM
robz71lm7 Man how I wish I had the $$$ to buy... Nov 19 2004, 06:18 PM
trackbird QUOTE (CMC #37 @ Nov 19 2004, 12:45 PM)As soo... Nov 19 2004, 06:37 PM
CMC #37 QUOTE (CMC #37 @ Nov 19 2004, 12:45 PM)
As soon as... Nov 19 2004, 07:07 PM
#07 QUOTE (KeithO @ Nov 19 2004, 08:51 AM)This mo... Nov 20 2004, 01:59 AM
94bird Keith, make sure the crate motor you're buying... Nov 20 2004, 03:16 AM
rmackintosh Well, I know others have grenaded "high milea... Nov 20 2004, 03:19 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th November 2025 - 01:00 AM |