![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
North of the border ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 2,307 Joined: 4-February 04 From: Montreal, CANADA Member No.: 177 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 297 Joined: 14-February 04 Member No.: 203 ![]() |
QUOTE (LT4Firehawk @ Feb 9 2005, 09:11 AM) The problem with F1 is the downforce, take that away and we'd see a lot more passing. I couldn't agree more. It's incredible to see film of guys in the 60's thowing and sliding those cars around corners. No wings. Imagine F1 without any wings at all. Like the worlds most high tech formula ford. That would be so cool to see. The reality is that they need to do something to bring the cars closer together. I LOVE the high tech, but on race day I want to see guys going at it ON THE TRACK! To bad the tracks aren't a little wider. Nascar vs F1 vs CART vs IRL vs ... If it's got a motor in it and I got the time then it's cool. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) For the best of both worlds, (nascar & F1) the IRL is hard to beat right now. And that's the truth, like it or not. If anyone has links to video of 60's F1 cars post'm up. Jimmy Clark has always been a hero of mine. That graff data is AWESOME. I love facts. Everyone should learn from that. Steve |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th June 2025 - 08:55 AM |