[robz71lm7]

I've been meaning to get around to writing a FAQ for the chassis and suspension tech fourm for a while. After finals I should be able to get it posted. Give me an idea of what you'd like to see.

Part choices? Product review? Theory (basic suspension dynamics)? Obviously having an impartial viewpoint would be necessary as people tend to get passionate about their way of doing things.

My main goal here is just to cut down on the same old questions as we continue grow and get new members.

[trackbird]

Nope, you can't do a "generic" setup and call it impartial - it WILL be biased. I also wouldn't try to divide it into OT vs AX; I've personally always found the OT stuff to be relevant to AX even if some don't feel it works the other way.

I simply try to disclose all sides or "schools of thought" when I'm aware of rational arguments for them.

You could divide it into a minimal setup (shocks and swaybar), a typical softer setup (550/150 or whatever), a typical firmer setup, and a benchmark ("typical" probably doesn't apply) heavily modified streetable setup (such as Jon's).

Of course, there are also some bad ideas that everyone can agree on (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Maybe that's more what I meant to say (but absouletly didn't).