![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 220 Joined: 17-June 05 Member No.: 778 ![]() |
http://www.scca.com/_FileLibrary/File/06-12-fastrack.pdf
I guess the DSP bimmer proposal got shot down due to a larger restructure in SP. I seriously hope they leave ESP alone (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/banghead.gif) |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Experienced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,936 Joined: 26-September 05 From: Youngstown, OH Member No.: 896 ![]() |
Howdy,
Well, they talk about best of breed, so here's what I think it should look like... :-) ASP -- as today BSP -- as today, plus anything awd turbo (all WRX on the same line, all Evo, all DSM, etc.) CSP -- as today, plus X1/9 DSP -- "new" class... Fast FWD cars. ITR, Neon, RSX, etc. etc. ESP -- as today, plus the IS300, E30 BMW, non-turbo awd. Slowest rwd or awd class. FSP -- "slow" fwd cars, probably as today. And yes, I figure that BSP might become the domain of the awd rally cars, particularly if they / manufacturers keep on developing. But maybe not, if there's enough "not fast enough for ASP" rwd stuff. Alternatively, you could make DSP "awd rally car land" and make FSP "fwd land". But that hoses every existing FSP car. Upside is it leaves BSP with the e36, S2000, 350Z etc. So, whaddya think? Mark |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th June 2025 - 10:53 PM |