IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules 
Blaine Fabrication.comHotpart.comSolo PerformanceUMI PerformanceUnbalanced Engineering
> new fast track and SP restructuring?
Joe Silva
post Nov 21 2006, 04:35 AM
Post #1


Member
*

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 220
Joined: 17-June 05
Member No.: 778



http://www.scca.com/_FileLibrary/File/06-12-fastrack.pdf

I guess the DSP bimmer proposal got shot down due to a larger restructure in SP. I seriously hope they leave ESP alone (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/banghead.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
BigEnos
post Nov 21 2006, 10:15 PM
Post #2


Collo Rosso
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,220
Joined: 3-August 05
From: San Antonio, TX
Member No.: 839



One car, that's exactly how many E30/IS300s are currently being competitively campaigned nationally. If there's even a chance that this car may outclass the current ESP cars then why are we, as a club, gonna do it? You do have to break eggs to make an omlette, but do you have to break *all* the eggs?

The WRX is a completely unrelated issue to this, and whether or not it is more competitive than the E30/IS300 would be is immaterial to whether the E30 or IS300, or both, should be moved to ESP.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marka
post Nov 22 2006, 03:03 AM
Post #3


Experienced Member
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,936
Joined: 26-September 05
From: Youngstown, OH
Member No.: 896



Howdy,

QUOTE (BigEnos @ Nov 21 2006, 05:15 PM) *
One car, that's exactly how many E30/IS300s are currently being competitively campaigned nationally. If there's even a chance that this car may outclass the current ESP cars then why are we, as a club, gonna do it? You do have to break eggs to make an omlette, but do you have to break *all* the eggs?

The WRX is a completely unrelated issue to this, and whether or not it is more competitive than the E30/IS300 would be is immaterial to whether the E30 or IS300, or both, should be moved to ESP.


The thing to me is that I just don't think an E30 or IS300 should be a problem for a good ESP car. I think they might have a chance, but are _way_ not overdogs.

The WRX isn't unrelated to this, since if the WRX is faster than the pony cars (and I think its got a better shot at this than the e30/is300 do) and our goal is to "leave ESP alone", then there's not an issue putting a car into esp that's slower than the WRX.

Mark

(who _really_ wants an SM-Heavy class... :-)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BigEnos
post Nov 22 2006, 03:33 PM
Post #4


Collo Rosso
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,220
Joined: 3-August 05
From: San Antonio, TX
Member No.: 839



QUOTE (marka @ Nov 21 2006, 10:03 PM) *
Howdy,

The WRX isn't unrelated to this, since if the WRX is faster than the pony cars (and I think its got a better shot at this than the e30/is300 do) and our goal is to "leave ESP alone", then there's not an issue putting a car into esp that's slower than the WRX.

Mark

(who _really_ wants an SM-Heavy class... :-)


There is a big difference here. The WRX has been in ESP for a long time, possibly since it came out. *And* there are not any currently being campaigned. I do think the newest iteration of the WRX could be the fastest thing is ESP, but that's just my own (and many others') reckoning. I'm not going to move a car that no one has setup yet because I *think* it might be really fast.

Fact is, by leaving the WRX there we are "leaving ESP alone". By adding a car(s) we are most definitely not leaving ESP alone.

Alex is an incredible driver in a very well setup car. If the E36 BMWs aren't moving, then why are we moving the E30/IS300s that have proven to be very competitive with the E36? If the E36 is moving, then why don't we just move the other two cars with it?

What exactly is it that the club is trying to accomplish? I've asked that question repeatedly, but I never get a candid answer. If ESP participation was low I could understand the SEB wanting to do something, but I see a healthy class with a clearly defined "type" of car that is popular and competitive. We have competitive cars on both coasts and spread around the center of the country so the interest is well distributed, too.

I laid back and took a wait-and-see approach with the last two attempts to redefine ESP (E36 BMW M3 and STiEvo). I won't anymore. I will fight all attempts to subjugate ponycars in ESP, either official or unofficial.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marka
post Nov 22 2006, 04:35 PM
Post #5


Experienced Member
***

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,936
Joined: 26-September 05
From: Youngstown, OH
Member No.: 896



Howdy,

QUOTE (BigEnos @ Nov 22 2006, 10:33 AM) *
There is a big difference here. The WRX has been in ESP for a long time, possibly since it came out. *And* there are not any currently being campaigned. I do think the newest iteration of the WRX could be the fastest thing is ESP, but that's just my own (and many others') reckoning. I'm not going to move a car that no one has setup yet because I *think* it might be really fast.

Fact is, by leaving the WRX there we are "leaving ESP alone". By adding a car(s) we are most definitely not leaving ESP alone.


Usually when people say they want to "leave a class alone" what they _really_ mean are that they don't want the class to change from what it is today. If someone builds a good WRX, I think it could well mean that alll the current ESP pony cars would be on the trailer. To me, that's not "leaving the class alone".

You'll note in my "this is how I think it should go", I actually moved those cars to BSP.

QUOTE
Alex is an incredible driver in a very well setup car. If the E36 BMWs aren't moving, then why are we moving the E30/IS300s that have proven to be very competitive with the E36? If the E36 is moving, then why don't we just move the other two cars with it?


Again, my ideas there would put the E36 in BSP. That's 'ok' because they can add a good bit of power if they're on the same line as the E36 M3. The E30 cars and the IS300 can't do that and personally I don't think they'd be dominant in ESP. Hence why I thought it would be smart to put them there.

I agree with you that if they'd be dominant in ESP, I don't think they should go there. However, we've had an excellent driver in both examples of those cars, setup well, and they haven't shown they'd be dominant in ESP. In the hunt maybe, but certainly not dominant.

QUOTE
What exactly is it that the club is trying to accomplish? I've asked that question repeatedly, but I never get a candid answer. If ESP participation was low I could understand the SEB wanting to do something, but I see a healthy class with a clearly defined "type" of car that is popular and competitive. We have competitive cars on both coasts and spread around the center of the country so the interest is well distributed, too.


Remember, these are just my ideas of how a restructuring could occur, and probably have nothing whatsoever to do with what the SPAC/SEB think should happen.

QUOTE
I laid back and took a wait-and-see approach with the last two attempts to redefine ESP (E36 BMW M3 and STiEvo). I won't anymore. I will fight all attempts to subjugate ponycars in ESP, either official or unofficial.


Dude, if you really think I'm out to "subjugate ponycars in ESP" then you haven't been paying attention for, like, _years_.

Simply put, the only reason that in my mind the E30 and IS300 would be ok in ESP is because they (still) wouldn't be the car to have for the class, but it happens to be the class they'd have the best shot in with DSP changing into something else.

Mark
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Joe Silva   new fast track and SP restructuring?   Nov 21 2006, 04:35 AM
Mojave   It looks like BP really did get the axe after all.   Nov 21 2006, 02:26 PM
Absolut Speed   QUOTE (Joe Silva @ Nov 20 2006, 10:35 PM)...   Nov 21 2006, 06:41 PM
marka   Howdy, Well, they talk about best of breed, so he...   Nov 21 2006, 07:03 PM
Joe Silva   QUOTE (marka @ Nov 21 2006, 01:03 PM) How...   Nov 21 2006, 09:08 PM
BigEnos   I think running against E30s and IS300s would suck...   Nov 21 2006, 09:13 PM
marka   Howdy, QUOTE (BigEnos @ Nov 21 2006, 04...   Nov 21 2006, 10:01 PM
trackbird   QUOTE (marka @ Nov 21 2006, 05:01 PM) Nat...   Nov 21 2006, 11:48 PM
Joe Silva   QUOTE (BigEnos @ Nov 21 2006, 03:13 PM) I...   Nov 21 2006, 09:38 PM
BigEnos   One car, that's exactly how many E30/IS300s ar...   Nov 21 2006, 10:15 PM
marka   Howdy, QUOTE (BigEnos @ Nov 21 2006, 05...   Nov 22 2006, 03:03 AM
BigEnos   QUOTE (marka @ Nov 21 2006, 10:03 PM) How...   Nov 22 2006, 03:33 PM
marka   Howdy, QUOTE (BigEnos @ Nov 22 2006, 10...   Nov 22 2006, 04:35 PM
BigEnos   QUOTE (marka @ Nov 22 2006, 11:35 AM) How...   Nov 22 2006, 05:11 PM
pknowles   QUOTE What exactly is it that the club is trying t...   Nov 22 2006, 05:10 PM

« Next Oldest · General Discussion · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th June 2025 - 12:43 AM