[Joe Silva]

http://www.scca.com/_FileLibrary/File/06-12-fastrack.pdf

I guess the DSP bimmer proposal got shot down due to a larger restructure in SP. I seriously hope they leave ESP alone (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/banghead.gif)

[pknowles]

What exactly is it that the club is trying to accomplish? I've asked that question repeatedly, but I never get a candid answer. If ESP participation was low I could understand the SEB wanting to do something, but I see a healthy class with a clearly defined "type" of car that is popular and competitive. We have competitive cars on both coasts and spread around the center of the country so the interest is well distributed, too.

I agree. It reminds me of when the S2000 got moved up to AS from BS. In the prevous years at Nats, BS had 60 drivers in 2003 and then 49 drivers in 2004. I couldn't beleive they would mess with BS since it was bring in such large numbers at the possibility of screwing over all those drivers. However, I do think BS is better today, but a lot of S2000 drivers jumped ship and I don't think that is a positive move IMHO.

I'll also say for the record that I hate it when the SEB publishes things like a hint of a major reorganization without any details of what they are tring to do. There needs to be a much better line of communication between the SEB and the membership. At least something to the effect of "Because of the overwhelming popularity of car YYY, we are tring to give car YYY and similar cars a more compeditive classing". And yes at the amiture level I think popularity of cars should be part of the classing processes.

This post has been edited by pknowles: Nov 22 2006, 05:10 PM