 93 tranny, pedals, shifter, hyd, etc. in IN $1300, thought I'd pass this info along |
|
|||||||||
  |
 Nov 24 2005, 03:22 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
newbie Group: Members Posts: 29 Joined: 31-July 04 From: Greer, SC Member No.: 423  |
A little off subject, but wouldn't the '93 T56 M29 be a "wide ratio" with the 2.97 first gear and 1.00 fourth gear, while the '94-'97 MN6 would be considered a "close ratio"? Or, are we comparing the rare "wide ratio" '93 M28 with the 3.36 first gear to the "close ratio" '93 M29 with the 2.97?
This post has been edited by Dan Man: Nov 24 2005, 03:35 AM |
 |
 
|
|
Nov 24 2005, 07:40 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Nothing says 'I love you.' like a box of Hydroshoks  Group: Moderators Posts: 5,284 Joined: 23-December 03 From: Granbury, TX Member No.: 4 |
QUOTE (Barney @ Nov 23 2005, 15:20) And will Mitch and Glen come over and help with the swap? (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/drink.gif) Yes, but nothing in life is for free .... |
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2005, 02:28 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Seeking round tuits Group: Advanced Members Posts: 5,522 Joined: 24-December 03 From: Kentucky Member No.: 33 |
QUOTE (Dan Man @ Nov 23 2005, 22:22) A little off subject, but wouldn't the '93 T56 M29 be a "wide ratio" with the 2.97 first gear and 1.00 fourth gear, while the '94-'97 MN6 would be considered a "close ratio"? Or, are we comparing the rare "wide ratio" '93 M28 with the 3.36 first gear to the "close ratio" '93 M29 with the 2.97? The 2.97 is a "close ratio" because it's closer than 3.36. |
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th May 2025 - 02:32 PM |